38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 28, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court refuses Haryana govts plea against HCs order quashing additional marks to Haryanas residents

By Jhanak Sharma      24 June, 2024 05:50 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court refuses Haryana govts plea against HCs order quashing additional marks to Haryanas residents

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused Haryana Governments plea challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court order quashing the states policy of granting additional marks to its residents in recruitment for certain posts based on socio-economic criteria.

A vacation bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court order setting aside the Haryana Governments policy of awarding extra marks.

The top court remarked that the Haryana Governments decision was a mere populist measure.

The Haryana State Staff Selection Commission moved the Supreme Court against the Punjab and Haryana High Courts May 31 order, which quashed Haryanas notification granting a five percent bonus to domicile candidates based on socio-economic conditions. The Haryana Government defended this decision.

In 2022, the Haryana Government issued a notification granting 5 percent additional marks to domiciles of Haryana in recruitment for Group C and D posts based on socio-economic criteria during the Common Entrance Test of 2023 (CET 2023).

The High Court ruled that the Haryana Government had created an artificial classification, resulting in discrimination between similarly placed persons. The High Court stated that all candidates applying for the post are equally entitled to selection based on the common examination conducted for all.

The Haryana Government implemented the policy in May 2022, affecting various categories of jobs across 63 groups for which the Common Eligibility Test (CET) was held. The High Court directed that a fresh merit list be prepared solely on the basis of CET marks of the candidates.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM

TOP STORIES

calcutta-hc-gives-split-verdict-on-juvenile-anticipatory-bail-refers-issue-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Gives Split Verdict on Juvenile Anticipatory Bail, Refers Issue to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court delivers split verdict on juveniles seeking anticipatory bail; majority bars pre-arrest relief, strong dissent prompts larger Bench review.

22 November, 2025 12:54 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email