38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, October 14, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

By Jhanak Singh      20 May, 2024 12:58 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to consider a plea for a direction to the Centre to stay the operation and implementation of three new criminal laws Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, replacing Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code and Indian Evidence Act respectively.

A vacation bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Rajesh Bindal said the new Acts have yet not been implemented and the petition has been drafted and filed in casual and cavalier manner.

Petitioner-advocate Vishal Tiwari, who appeared in person, sought to withdraw the plea, which was allowed by the court.

At the outset, the bench expressed its inclination to dismiss the plea.

Petitioner sought to make a representation to the Union government. The court also declined this request.

Tiwari sought directions to immediately constitute an expert committee under the chairmanship of former judge of Supreme Court to examine, assess, identify the viability of three new criminal laws. The petitioner said new criminal law do not bring any new changes from the previous ones, except a few, but create confusion among citizen and provide more power to police and supress the fundamental rights.

The petitioner claimed that there were irregularities in passage of the three laws as not much debate and discussion took place due to suspension of several MPs from Parliament.

Besides questioning validity of the three laws on several grounds, the petitioner said the introduction of new criminal bills may bring about complex legal provisions, ambiguous language, or intricate procedural requirements.

"Lawyers may face challenges in interpreting and navigating these complexities, potentially leading to delays and legal uncertainties," his plea said.

It also stated compliance with new criminal bills may lead to increased operational costs for law firms, including investments in legal technology, research tools, and specialised expertise required to effectively handle cases under the revised legal framework.

"It is important to note that these problems are potential challenges that lawyers may encounter with the introduction of new criminal bills, and the specific impacts can vary based on the nature and scope of the legislation," it said.

President Droupadi Murmu has in December, 2023 given assent to the three new criminal laws, passed by Parliament. The codes are to come into effect from July 1, 2024.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

TRENDING NEWS

bci-urges-cji-to-bring-in-for-urgent-reforms-in-courtroom-decorum-in-high-courts
Trending Judiciary
BCI urges CJI to bring in for urgent reforms in courtroom decorum in High Courts [Read Letter]

BCI urges CJI for urgent reforms on judicial conduct in High Courts, highlighting misconduct incidents and calling for mental health evaluations for judges.

14 October, 2024 10:27 AM

TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM
sc-dismisses-plea-for-review-of-judgment-on-electoral-bonds-scheme
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for review of judgment on Electoral Bonds Scheme [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking review of the February 15, 2024 Constitution bench judgment which struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds scheme as unconstitutional.

09 October, 2024 03:41 PM
sc-rejects-review-plea-against-judgment-allowing-states-to-levy-tax-on-minerals
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review plea against judgment allowing states to levy tax on minerals [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has rejected a review petition against its July 25 judgment which held that States have got legislative competence to levy tax on mineral-bearing lands.

09 October, 2024 03:53 PM
sc-dismisses-review-plea-against-aug-1-judgment-on-sub-classification-of-sc-sts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses review plea against Aug 1 judgment on sub classification of SC/STs [Read Order]

The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea for review of its August 1, 2024 judgment which allowed the States to sub classify Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to provide preferential treatment to the disadvantaged groups among them in government jobs and education.

09 October, 2024 04:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email