38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing On Plea Against Presidential Order On Article 370

By LawStreet News Network      08 August, 2019 12:08 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing On Plea Against Presidential Order On Article 370

The Supreme Court today i.e., August 8, 2019, declined an urgent hearing on the petition filed by Advocate M.L. Sharma challenging the Presidential Order on Article 370 of the Constitution which revoked the special status granted to Jammu and Kashmir in 1947.

The matter was mentioned before JusticeN.V. Ramana.

Sharma said that the matter could be taken to the United Nations and "we might lose Kashmir". He, therefore, prayed that the matter should be taken up urgently.

Justice Ramana, however, declined asking, "Can UN stay Indian Constitution's amendment?"

He then asked Sharma to clear defects and matter will be listed in due course.

Sharma has filed the plea challenging the Constitution (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Order, 2019, which was passed on August 5, 2019, to supersede the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954.

In his petition, Sharma stated that the Presidential Order is unconstitutional as it was passed without taking consent from the state assembly.

It was also stated that Article 370 cannot be nullified by exercising powers under Article 370 itself and hence the Order is ultra vires.

The Presidential Order paved the way for the introduction of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019, which aims to bifurcate the State of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories - Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir, and Union Territory of Ladakh.

The Bill was passed by the Parliament on August 6, 2019, after receiving clearance from the Lok Sabha, a day after it received a nod from the Rajya Sabha.

On August 6, 2019, the President also formally declared the removal of Article 370 of the Constitution, notifying that the provision has ceased to operate and that "all provisions of this Constitution, as amended from time to time, without any modification or exceptions, shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir."



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email