38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Repatriate Mortal Remains of Sufi Saint from Dhaka

By Jhanak Sharma      06 April, 2024 01:40 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Repatriate Mortal Remains of Sufi Saint from Dhaka

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday rejected plea for bringing back the mortal remains of Sufi saint Hazrat Shah Muhammad Abdul Muqtadir Shah Masood Ahmad, an Indian-born Pakistani national, who died in Dhaka in 2022.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said Ahmad obtained Pakistani citizenship in 1992 and he was buried in Dhaka.

"How can you expect the Union of India to rebury him in India," the bench asked the counsel.

Advocate Arundhati Katju, however, contended he had no family or followers in Pakistan, whereas the Dargah here, in Uttar Pradesh, he was the sajjada-nashin, an administrator or a caretaker of a religious place.

As a matter of first principle, it would not be right for this court to direct the transportation of the mortal remains of a citizen of a foreign state in India, the bench said.

The counsel, however, asked the court to consider the plea filed Dargah Hazrat Mulla Syed.

If Bangladesh allows exhumation, the question today is whether the Union of India would permit the transportation of the body to India for the purpose of burial, she asked.

"How can the court allow this, since he was a Pakistani national and that there is no legal right," the bench pointed out.

The counsel contended that her client had made representations to the Union government, but no reply has been received so far.

There is no substance in it. How can anybody, who is not a citizen of India, either his family or followers, or group say that we want to bury him here," the bench asked.

The counsel said the grave in Bangladesh is not tended to, which was also a concern, besides, there are no followers.

We understand the sentiment but we have to go by enforceable constitutional right, the bench said.

The counsel said for the sajjada-nashin to be buried in the dargah is the customary right, which the dargah is enforcing.

She said that the deceased was elected as the 'sajjada-nashin' of the shrine Dargah Hazrat Mulla Syed Mohammad Shah in 2008 in Prayagraj and he executed his will in 2021 expressing a desire to be buried in the shrine.

He, however, got Pakistani citizenship in 1992.

The bench said there are difficulties in entertaining such a petition and he was a Pakistani citizen and he has no constitutional right that the practical difficulties related to exhumation.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email