New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Supreme Court Seals Nine Amrapali Group Properties [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      11 October, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Seals Nine Amrapali Group Properties [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on October 10, 2018, in the case of Bikram Chatterji & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., ordered sealing of nine properties of real estate major Amrapali in Noida and Greater Noida after its three directors, who are in police custody, said documents of the groups 46 companies were stored there.

A Bench of Justices U.U. Lalit and D.Y. Chandrachud said that the presence of the three directors will not be insisted upon by the police if the entire exercise of sealing the premises was completed on October 10, 2018.

However, if the exercise is not complete, the present status will continue except that these applicants, instead of being put up in the lock-up, shall be kept in the police station itself, the Bench ordered.

Earlier, on October 9, 2018, the Bench had ordered the police to take into custody three directors of the group Anil Kumar Sharma, Shiv Priya and Ajay Kumar after they failed to hand over company documents to forensic auditors.

Following the order, the three directors have been lodged in the lock-up at a police station near the Supreme Court.

The counsel for the directors on October 9, 2018, submitted that they are willing to handover all the documents that are presently lying at nine places and the directors are willing to take the police to their location.

The Bench, then, directed the Superintendents of Police of Noida/Greater Noida to take the trio to all the locations and in their presence, seal all the premises.

The sealed premises can be visited only by the forensic auditors or by other persons under their express authorization. No other person shall be allowed entry into the said premises, the top court said.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-reconstitutes-gender-sensitisation-and-internal-complaints-committee-justice-bv-nagarathna-continues-as-chairperson
Trending Judiciary
SC Reconstitutes Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee; Justice B.V. Nagarathna Continues as Chairperson [Read Order]

Supreme Court reconstitutes Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee; Justice B.V. Nagarathna continues as Chairperson.

28 May, 2026 11:26 AM
promissory-estoppel-cannot-be-used-to-claim-benefits-not-meant-for-industry-class-sc
Trending Judiciary
Promissory Estoppel Cannot Be Used to Claim Benefits Not Meant for Industry Class: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules promissory estoppel cannot be used to claim industrial benefits never intended for that class of enterprise.

28 May, 2026 04:23 PM

TOP STORIES

senior-citizens-need-not-be-penniless-or-destitute-to-seek-protection-under-2007-act-gauhati-hc-upholds-sons-eviction
Trending Judiciary
Senior Citizens Need Not Be “Penniless or Destitute” To Seek Protection Under 2007 Act: Gauhati HC Upholds Son’s Eviction [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court upheld sons’ eviction from their 86-year-old father’s house, ruling senior citizens need not be destitute to seek relief.

23 May, 2026 02:19 PM
threat-to-leak-bath-video-violates-womans-dignity-chastity-sc
Trending Judiciary
Threat to Leak Bath Video Violates Woman’s Dignity, Chastity: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that threatening to upload a woman’s bath video amounts to imputing unchastity and violates dignity and sexual autonomy.

23 May, 2026 02:27 PM
sc-questions-reservation-for-children-of-high-ranking-ias-officers
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Reservation for Children of High-Ranking IAS Officers

Supreme Court questions OBC reservation for children of IAS officers, saying socially advanced families should ideally move out of quota benefits.

23 May, 2026 02:44 PM
bombay-hc-considers-framing-21-point-interim-guidelines-for-protection-of-advocates-from-violence
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Considers Framing 21-Point Interim Guidelines for Protection of Advocates from Violence [Read Order]

Bombay HC considers 21-point interim guidelines to protect advocates from violence, including safeguards against arrest and intimidation.

23 May, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email