38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Ban On Former Cricketer Sreesanth

By LawStreet News Network      15 March, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Ban On Former Cricketer Sreesanth

The Supreme Court today (March 15, 2019) set aside the life ban on former Indian cricketer S. Sreesanth in a case of spot-fixing and asked the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to re-examine its quantum of punishment.

A Bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan and K.M. Joseph observed that the life ban imposed on the cricketer is “too harsh” and asked the BCCI disciplinary committee to review the quantum of his punishment in three months. The Bench, however, upheld his indictment in the wake of the 2013 Indian Premier League (IPL) spot-fixing scandal.

The judgment was passed on an appeal filed by Sreesanth against the judgment of the Kerala High Court, which had affirmed the life ban imposed by BCCI.

In August 2017, a single-judge Bench of the Kerala High Court had lifted the life ban imposed on Sreesanth by BCCI. But later on, the life ban was restored by a division Bench on an appeal filed by the board.

Senior advocate Salman Khurshid, appearing for Sreesanth, told the Bench that "In the context of facts and manner in which these things have happened, this court should consider that it (life ban on Sreesanth by BCCI) is unfair. He has suffered for the last five-six years. People want him to play cricket. He was extremely loyal to BCCI.”

Khurshid argued before the Bench, that it was not established that spot-fixing was done in the match played between Indian Premier League teams Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab in Mohali in May 2013 and there was no evidence that the cricketer received any money for this. "The team (Rajasthan Royals) and its owners were banned for two years only. It is completely unfair that this (life ban) has happened with him (Sreesanth)," Khurshid said.

Further, Khurshid told the Bench that the confession made by the cricketer was due to continuous torture by Delhi Police. “According to Sreesanth, police had threatened to implicate his family if he does not confess to the crime,” the lawyer added. The Bench had on March 1, 2019, reserved its judgment on Sreesanth's appeal.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

to-uphold-presumption-of-guilt-under-section-29-pocso-act-foundational-facts-must-be-proved-reiterates-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
To uphold presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO Act, foundational facts must be proved, reiterates Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reiterates that to uphold the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, the prosecution must prove the ‘foundational facts’ beyond reasonable doubt.

16 April, 2024 12:54 PM
baba-ramdev-acharya-balkrishna-offer-to-make-public-apology-in-sc-for-misleading-advertisements
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-sets-aside-judgment-upholding-arbitral-award-against-dmrc
Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-third-plea-for-arvind-kejriwals-removal-as-delhi-cm-blasts-petitioner-for-abuse-of-judicial-process
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
use-of-social-media-to-interfere-with-administration-of-justice-needs-serious-consideration-sc
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
two-day-conference-on-april-on-technology-and-dialogue-between-sc-and-singapore
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email