38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 26, 2024


By Tanurag Ghosh      02 July, 2020 05:21 PM      0 Comments

On Monday, 29th June 2020, the Supreme Court has instructed the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to clarify its position with respect to the status of visas of 2,500 people from 35 different countries. These foreign nationals are none other than the people who attended the Tablighi Jamaat conference in Delhi. The movement of Jamaat received widespread criticism throughout the country as many people traveled to remote parts of the country and tested positive for the virus, resulting in allegations of spreading the infection. 

The apex court bench hearing the matter comprised of Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. It asked the union government to place on record whether individual notices have been issued regarding visa cancellation. The hearing took place through video-conferencing medium and has been postponed to 2nd July 2020 for further adjudication.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Advocate Rajat Nair appeared on behalf of the Union government. They were told by the bench that the government should explain what these people are doing in Indian territory if their visa has been canceled. Advocate Nair said that copies of the petitions have not been served upon them and sought time to file a reply.

The matter has been taken up with the bench clubbing these petitions filed by foreign nationals. The court has clarified that cancellation of visa should be on a case to case basis by the Ministry of Home Affairs and is now seeking information regarding such actions taken by the aforementioned ministry. Appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Senior Advocate CU Singh pointed out that there was no individual consideration but a blanket ban by the ministry resulting in a problematic scenario for these people. Authorities have taken away their passports resulting in the subsequent loss of liberty and these non-citizens are forced to stay in institutions with limited liberty. 

Currently, the court’s point of view is that a press release was issued by the ministry which has no effect on the status of visas as for its cancellation, a subjective investigation should take place. On 26th June 2020, the court asked advocates of the petitioners to serve copies to union representatives. A total of 4 petitions have been filed challenging union’s orders dating 2nd April 2020 and 4th June 2020 which affect more than 2500 people. 

The petitions have been filed by Advocate FA Ayubbi and drafted by Advocates Ibad Mushtaq and Ashima Mandla. They contended that the ‘en-masse’ blacklisting of foreigners without any opportunity to defend themselves is a blatant violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The petition states that the immediate blacklisting, registration of FIRs which led to the forfeiture of passports resulted in complete deprivation of personal liberty without any procedure established by law.

It pointed out that the home countries of these foreigners are increasingly becoming worried and their embassies have started asking for their return repeatedly. The petitions seek to get the court to order the Ministry of Home Affairs to lift this ban along with reinstatement of visas and assistance in return by the Ministry of External Affairs.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 20 - May 25]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

26 May, 2024 11:25 AM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email