38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

"Believe In The Law" Says SC In Plea Seeking Removal Of Anti-CAA Protestors From Shaheen Bagh Today

By LawStreet News Network      10 February, 2020 02:02 PM      0 Comments

The Supreme Court is hearing the pleas on the 10th of February, 2020 that sought the removal of anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019 protestors from Shaheen Bagh. The batch of petitions against the Shaheen Bagh after the Apex Court had deferred it's judgement in the view of the February 8th 2020 Delhi elections will be heard. The issue came before the court on Friday and the SC said it did not want to "influence" the Delhi assembly elections a day ahead of polls.

"We understand there is a problem and we have to see how to resolve it. We will take it up on Monday. We will be in a better position by then," a bench comprising Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph said.

When an advocate appearing for one of the petitioners said that voting for Delhi election is scheduled on February 8, the bench said, "That is exactly why we are saying come on Monday. Why should we influence it?"

The updates following the hearing are as : 

  1. Supreme court remarked that the protests should happen only in designated areas. "You cannot block public road indefinitely. If everybody starts protesting everywhere, then what will happen", asked Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul. There has to be defined areas of protests. 
  2. The matters are brought before the court. Please believe in the law despite that some people want to protest. 

SC-- the matters are before court. Please believe in the law, despite that some people want to protest. Advocate Amit Sahni argues that the right to protest goes to some extent only. Supreme Court retorts that if the protests have been lasted for 58 days, you can wait for one more week. They have the right to protest, but there cannot be an indefinite period of protest in a common area.

  1. Notice has been issued to the Central Government, police regarding this. 

Supreme Court has declined to pass an order to remove the protestors for now. The next hearing will be on the 17th of February 2020. 

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email