38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 30, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court To Examine 2016 Demonetisation Decision

By LawStreet News Network      13 October, 2022 04:18 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court To Examine 2016 Demonetisation Decision

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Centre and the RBI to file a "comprehensive affidavit" on the 2016 decision to demonetise Rs 1000 and Rs 500 currency notes.

The court also asked the Centre to keep the files ready in connection with its letter to the RBI, the RBI Board's decision, and the demonetisation announcement by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 7, 2016.

During the hearing, a five-judge bench headed by Justice S Abdul Nazeer said the court is aware of its Lakshman Rekha on judicial review of government policy but the court needs to examine the matter as both sides do not agree if it was an academic exercise.

The bench, also comprising justices B R Gavai, A S Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian, and B V Nagarathna, noted that the petitioners main argument is Section 26 of the RBI Act does not authorise the Centre to completely cancel the currency notes of particular denomination.

"Therefore, the main question is whether the government had powers under Section 26 of RBI Act to demonetise all notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 denomination," the bench said.

The bench fixed more than 50 petitions questioning the Centres 2016 demonetisation decision for further hearing on November 9.

Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Centre, said the issue has become an academic exercise now.

On the contrary, senior advocate P Chidambaram for petitioners said the issue is still relevant for the future as the 2016 decision led to horrendous consequences for the economy and common people.

The petitioners also claimed the government did not have power to cancel the currency notes through an executive order.

The AG, for his part, said when the Act is not challenged, the notifications cannot be challenged and the issues are academic.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

supreme-court-appoints-two-new-judges-justice-alok-aradhe-and-future-cji-vipul-pancholi
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Appoints Two New Judges: Justice Alok Aradhe & Future CJI Vipul Pancholi

SC gets two new judges — Justices Alok Aradhe and Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, with Pancholi set to be CJI in 2031. Oath administered by CJI Gavai.

29 August, 2025 02:23 PM
sc-to-hear-on-monday-pleas-to-extend-september-1-deadline-for-claims-objections-in-bihar-sir
Trending Judiciary
SC to hear on Monday pleas to extend September 8 deadline for claims, objections in Bihar SIR [Read Order]

SC to hear on Monday pleas seeking extension of Sept 8 deadline for filing claims, objections in Bihar voter list revision.

29 August, 2025 02:32 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM
18-former-judges-write-to-union-home-minister-amit-shah-criticizing-his-remarks-on-justice-b-sudershan-reddy
Trending Judiciary
18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

18 ex-judges write to Union HM Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy, stressing judicial independence and dignity.

25 August, 2025 03:09 PM
sc-stays-investigation-into-firs-against-csds-co-director-sanjay-kumar
Trending Judiciary
SC stays investigation into FIRs against CSDS co director Sanjay Kumar

SC stays probe into FIRs against CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar over Maharashtra polling data post; says multiple cases show harassment motive.

25 August, 2025 03:14 PM
influencers-indulging-in-commercial-speech-cant-claim-fundamental-right-sc
Trending CelebStreet
Influencers indulging in commercial speech can't claim fundamental right: SC

SC: Influencers making commercial speech can’t claim fundamental rights; must apologize and act responsibly towards community sensitivities.

25 August, 2025 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email