38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court to hear another plea for FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for Sanatan Dharma Remarks

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      28 September, 2023 01:42 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court to hear another plea for FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for Sanatan Dharma Remarks

The Supreme Court on Wednesday decided to consider another plea lodging an FIR against Tamil Nadu Minister and DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin over his controversial remarks about 'Sanatan Dharma'.

The top court brushed aside strong opposition by the Tamil Nadu government and tagged the plea with a pending petition on which a notice was issued last week.

Udhayanidhi is son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin.

On Wednesday, hearing a plea by advocate Vineet Jindal, a bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi said that it would not be issuing notice on this petition, but merely tagging it with the other plea.

Jindal alleged that Stalins comments constituted hate speech and asked the court to initiate criminal proceedings against him for hurting religious sentiments.

Tamil Nadu's Additional Advocate General Amit Anand Tiwari opposed the plea and asked the court to not entertain it.

Tiwari said these are public interest litigations in the nature of publicity interest litigation and there are several writ petitions filed across the country in different high courts.

This makes it incredibly difficult for the state. Now, everyone is coming up as a public interest litigant for publicity, he said.

He questioned the need for another petition, when the court had already agreed to hear a similar plea.

The bench, however, said the court is not issuing a notice, but tagging this with the other one.

We will examine the question of entertaining on the next day, the bench said.

Advocate Raj Kishore Chaudhary for the petitioner, however, said a genocidal call has been made by the state.

In his plea, Jindal said being a Hindu and Sanatan dharma follower, his religious sentiments are hurt by statements made by Udhayanidhi Stalin calling for eradicating Sanatan dharma and further comparing Sanatan with mosquitoes, dengue, corona, and malaria.

Being a follower of Sanatan Dharma, the petitioner claimed he is deeply concerned over the remarks which undeniably amount to "hate speech".

His words show his hate towards Sanatan Dharma. He is an MLA and Minister in the Tamil Nadu Government and has taken oath to work as per the constitution of our country and must respect all the regions but he intentionally made a provocative and defamatory statement for the Sanatan Dharma with the intent to promote enmity between groups on the grounds of religion, the plea said.

The Supreme Court had on September 22 issued notice to Stalin and Tamil Nadu government over his remarks on Sanatan Dharma. The plea was filed by a Madras-based lawyer, B Jagannath seeking registration of an FIR against Stalin and also an injunction against him and his followers not to make any further hate speech against Sanatan Dharma/ Hinduism.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Stalin Junior's Remarks on Sanatana Dharma Spark Comparisons with UK PM's Proud Hindu Identity Stalin Junior's Remarks on Sanatana Dharma Spark Comparisons with UK PM's Proud Hindu Identity

Explore the controversy surrounding Tamil Nadu minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's remarks on 'Sanatana Dharma' and the comparison with UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who proudly identifies as a Hindu. Understand the contrasting views on religious identity in this article.

Supreme Court to hear another plea for FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for Sanatan Dharma Remarks Supreme Court to hear another plea for FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for Sanatan Dharma Remarks

Stay updated on the Supreme Court's consideration of a plea against Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin for his controversial remarks about 'Sanatan Dharma.' Get insights into the legal proceedings and public sentiment.

Sanatan Dharma Row: Bengaluru court orders FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin Sanatan Dharma Row: Bengaluru court orders FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin

Bengaluru court orders FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin over his controversial statement on Sanatana Dharma.

'Not layman but a minister, you should know the consequences,' SC pulls up Udhayanidhi Stalin for anti Hindu statements 'Not layman but a minister, you should know the consequences,' SC pulls up Udhayanidhi Stalin for anti Hindu statements

SC criticizes TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin for anti-Hindu remarks, advising him to approach High Courts for FIR clubbing, highlighting speech responsibility.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email