38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Will Not Stay SC/ST (Amendment) Act, 2018

By LawStreet News Network      08 September, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Will Not Stay SC/ST (Amendment) Act, 2018

On Friday (September 7th, 2018), the Supreme Court of India refused to stay the recent amendments to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The matter came before the court in a petition filed by Prathvi Raj Chauhan, a lawyer, seeking to declare the new amendments as ultra vires.

Admitting the petition, a Bench led by Justice A.K. Sikri directed the government to reply to allegations that the amendments were made to appease the Dalits ahead of the 2019 general election.

Counsel appearing for the Petitioner asked the Bench to stay the operation of the new provisions till the petition is being heard by the court.

To this, the Bench said that What stay? It is now a legislation and cannot be stayed at this stage." The counsel said the government has brought in the new provisions to overrule the verdict passed by the court and without removing the defects.

Further, Mr. Chauhan said in his petition that after this unconstitutional amendment, this court is not expected to adopt a passive or negative role and remain bystander or a spectator if violation of rights is observed.

On August 9, 2018, Parliament passed the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Amendment Bill, 2018 to overturn the apex court order concerning certain safeguards against arrest under the SC/ST law.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

the-faustian-bargain-judicial-paternalism-legislative-silence-and-the-crisis-of-masculinity-in-indian-matrimonial-law
Trending Vantage Points
The Faustian Bargain: Judicial Paternalism, Legislative Silence, and the Crisis of Masculinity in Indian Matrimonial Law

Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani critically examines Indian matrimonial law, judicial paternalism, and gender bias, calling for gender-neutral domestic violence laws and equal constitutional protection for men and women alike.

11 May, 2026 11:07 AM
sc-refuses-to-hear-pleas-against-aor-exam-2026-cancellation
Trending Judiciary
SC Refuses To Hear Pleas Against AOR Exam 2026 Cancellation

Supreme Court refuses to hear pleas against cancellation of AOR Exam 2026 and asks aggrieved lawyers to submit representation to the CJI.

11 May, 2026 02:22 PM

TOP STORIES

mamata-banerjee-refuses-to-resign-after-historic-election-defeat
Trending Political NEWS
Mamata Banerjee Refuses to Resign After Historic Election Defeat

Mamata Banerjee defies convention, refuses to resign despite massive poll defeat—triggering a constitutional debate over mandate, legality, and democratic norms.

05 May, 2026 10:29 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-spicejets-review-petition-against-144-crore-deposit-order-imposes-50000-costs
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects SpiceJet’s Review Petition Against ₹144 Crore Deposit Order, Imposes ₹50,000 Costs

Delhi High Court rejects SpiceJet’s review against ₹144 crore deposit order in Maran dispute, imposes ₹50,000 costs for non-compliance with directions.

05 May, 2026 12:36 PM
silence-of-differently-abled-rape-victim-cannot-suppress-truth-courts-must-focus-on-substance-over-manner-of-expression-sikkim-hc
Trending Judiciary
Silence of Differently-Abled Rape Victim Cannot Suppress Truth; Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Manner of Expression: Sikkim HC [Read Judgment]

Sikkim High Court upholds rape conviction, ruling that a differently-abled victim’s silence cannot override credible medical and eyewitness evidence.

05 May, 2026 12:45 PM
sc-stays-5-lakh-cost-condition-for-setting-aside-non-bailable-warrants-against-accused-in-sfio-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays ₹5 Lakh Cost Condition for Setting Aside Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in SFIO Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court stays ₹5 lakh cost condition for setting aside non-bailable warrants in SFIO case, says validity of such condition needs examination.

05 May, 2026 12:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email