38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC has sought AGs Response on Viability of Serving Demand Notice Under S. 138 of NI Act Via WhatsApp/Email

By Parth Thummar      09 June, 2020 09:36 PM      0 Comments
SupremeCourt Demand Notice S138NIAct

The Supreme Court has on June 08, 2020, sought the response of the Attorney General KK Venugopal in an application seeking service of demand notice in "dishonor of cheque" cases through Email and WhatsApp under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 

The Supreme Court wanted to know the viability of alternative means of service and ways to ensure that the said service through these alternative modes is not misused. 

The issue had come up through the interlocutory application filed in the suo moto case taken by the SC extending the limitation period for filing of cases in the wake of COVID-19.

CJI S. A. Bobde had noted that, 

We have been told by some experts that people try to misuse service through email and WhatsApp. So, AG may reply as to how can this be done without abusing such liberties. Let him tell us what his advice is, so it can be considered. We are not experts on this.

When Advocate Bintu Thomas submitted that the extension of limitation must also be made applicable to re-filings, CJI had clarified that, 

Whether filings or re-filing, the same principles will apply. If the time expires during the period of lockdown, the same principle will apply. Whenever we pass that order, well say so. 

Earlier, on March 23, 2020, a Bench headed by CJI had passed a general order extending Limitation with effect from March 15, 2020, invoking special powers under Supreme Court Article 142 of the Constitution of India. 

The March 23 order had been passed to reduce physical filings in courts and tribunals across the countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The Supreme Court had ordered,

To obviate such difficulties and to ensure that lawyers/litigants do not have to come physically to file such proceedings in respective Courts/Tribunals across the country including this Court, it is hereby ordered that a period of limitation in all such proceedings, irrespective of the limitation prescribed under the general law or Special Laws whether condonable or not shall stand extended w.e.f. 15th March  2020  tillfurther order/s to be passed by this Court in present proceedings. 

The bench had further stated that the order will be binding on all courts/tribunals as per Article 141. Article 141 makes Law declared by the Supreme Court to be binding on all the Courts.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

neet-ug-2026-exam-cancelled-over-rajasthan-paper-leak-allegations-cbi-investigation-ordered
Trending News Updates
NEET-UG 2026 Exam Cancelled Over Rajasthan Paper Leak Allegations, CBI Investigation Ordered

NEET-UG 2026 cancelled after Rajasthan paper leak allegations. CBI probe ordered as questions arise over exam security and students’ future.

12 May, 2026 05:39 PM

TOP STORIES

register-entry-not-mandatory-for-oppression-mismanagement-plea-under-companies-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Register Entry Not Mandatory for Oppression, Mismanagement Plea Under Companies Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules formal entry in register of members is not mandatory to maintain oppression and mismanagement petitions under Companies Act.

07 May, 2026 10:51 AM
law-firm-terminates-partner-facing-pocso-charges-for-alleged-assault-of-six-year-old-daughter-mother-challenges-bail-before-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Law Firm Terminates Partner Facing POCSO Charges for Alleged Assault of Six-Year-Old Daughter; Mother Challenges Bail Before Bombay High Court

A Leading Law firm terminates partner accused under POCSO Act for alleged assault of six-year-old daughter; Bombay High Court to hear bail challenge.

07 May, 2026 11:00 AM
sc-allows-lifting-of-corporate-veil-in-holding-company-cirp-to-include-subsidiary-assets-restores-earth-infrastructure-resolution-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Allows Lifting of Corporate Veil in Holding Company CIRP to Include Subsidiary Assets; Restores Earth Infrastructure Resolution Plans [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court allows lifting of corporate veil in Earth Infrastructure CIRP, restores stalled project resolution plans, and denies GNIDA penal charges.

07 May, 2026 11:55 AM
sc-refuses-adjournment-in-pleas-against-law-removing-cji-from-ec-selection-panel
Trending Judiciary
SC Refuses Adjournment in Pleas Against Law Removing CJI From EC Selection Panel

Supreme Court refused to adjourn hearing on petitions challenging the law removing the CJI from the Election Commissioner selection panel.

07 May, 2026 12:12 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email