38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC has sought AGs Response on Viability of Serving Demand Notice Under S. 138 of NI Act Via WhatsApp/Email

By Parth Thummar      09 June, 2020 09:36 PM      0 Comments
SupremeCourt Demand Notice S138NIAct

The Supreme Court has on June 08, 2020, sought the response of the Attorney General KK Venugopal in an application seeking service of demand notice in "dishonor of cheque" cases through Email and WhatsApp under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 

The Supreme Court wanted to know the viability of alternative means of service and ways to ensure that the said service through these alternative modes is not misused. 

The issue had come up through the interlocutory application filed in the suo moto case taken by the SC extending the limitation period for filing of cases in the wake of COVID-19.

CJI S. A. Bobde had noted that, 

We have been told by some experts that people try to misuse service through email and WhatsApp. So, AG may reply as to how can this be done without abusing such liberties. Let him tell us what his advice is, so it can be considered. We are not experts on this.

When Advocate Bintu Thomas submitted that the extension of limitation must also be made applicable to re-filings, CJI had clarified that, 

Whether filings or re-filing, the same principles will apply. If the time expires during the period of lockdown, the same principle will apply. Whenever we pass that order, well say so. 

Earlier, on March 23, 2020, a Bench headed by CJI had passed a general order extending Limitation with effect from March 15, 2020, invoking special powers under Supreme Court Article 142 of the Constitution of India. 

The March 23 order had been passed to reduce physical filings in courts and tribunals across the countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The Supreme Court had ordered,

To obviate such difficulties and to ensure that lawyers/litigants do not have to come physically to file such proceedings in respective Courts/Tribunals across the country including this Court, it is hereby ordered that a period of limitation in all such proceedings, irrespective of the limitation prescribed under the general law or Special Laws whether condonable or not shall stand extended w.e.f. 15th March  2020  tillfurther order/s to be passed by this Court in present proceedings. 

The bench had further stated that the order will be binding on all courts/tribunals as per Article 141. Article 141 makes Law declared by the Supreme Court to be binding on all the Courts.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

reimagining-womens-trauma-a-feminist-study-of-modern-indian-women-authors
Trending Vantage Points
Reimagining Women's Trauma: A Feminist Study of Modern Indian Women Authors

A feminist socio-legal study examining how modern Indian women authors reimagine trauma as resistance, agency, and dignity within evolving legal frameworks.

17 March, 2026 01:27 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email