38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC: Final Hearing in Maratha Reservation Case Will Begin From March 17; Refused To Stay Bombay HC Order

By LawStreet News Network      05 February, 2020 11:02 PM      0 Comments
SC: Final Hearing in Maratha Reservation Case Will Begin From March 17; Refused To Stay Bombay HC Order

On February 5, 2020 a Supreme Court division bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Deepak Gupta said that final hearing in Maratha reservation case will begin from March 17, 2020 and refused to give any interim stay order. It said there is already an interim order passed by the apex court that any appointments made will be subject to the outcome of the batch of petitions.

"We will hear on March 17, 2020, no adjournment will be granted and all pleadings will be completed by then. We will hear the matter finally and pass the order. We are not staying it. Already there is an order that all appointments will be subject to the outcome of this petition," said the Apex Court.

Advocate Sanjeet Shukla, a representative of "Youth for Equality", said the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, enacted to grant reservation to the Maratha community people in jobs and education, breached the 50% ceiling on reservation fixed by the top court in its judgment in the case of Indira Sawhney v. Union Of India.

During the hearing of the case in the top court, Senior Advocate Gopal Shankar Narayan appearing for the petitioner asked the bench to stay the High Court order as the reservation today is 65 % in education and 62 % in jobs, exceeding 50 % cap in total reservation.

"We make it clear that the order of the High Court on reservation will not have retrospective effect,"the apex court had said when one of the lawyers alleged that the state government has passed an order applying the quota to nearly 70,000 vacancies with effect from 2014.

Following many agitations by Maratha community demanding reservation. Maharashtra government on November 30, 2020 enacted Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 to grant reservation to the Maratha community people in jobs and admissions. Through this enactment government provided 16 percent reservation to Maratha community which exceeds 50% bar set by Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney case. Following which many petitions were filed challenging constitutional validity of the act.

Bombay High Court division bench of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre in their judgement on June 17, 2019, uphold constitutional validity of SEBC Act and directed Maharashtra Government to reduce 16% reservation to 12-13%, as recommended by the State Backward Classes Commission. The court in its judgement said that state government on special circumstances can exceed the bar of 50% set by Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney case.

 

Author Satwik Sharma



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

injunction-suit-without-declaration-of-title-not-maintainable-when-possession-lies-with-defendant-sc
Trending Judiciary
Injunction Suit Without Declaration Of Title Not Maintainable When Possession Lies With Defendant: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an injunction suit without a declaration of title is not maintainable when possession rests with the defendant.

06 November, 2025 03:25 PM
when-multiple-documents-on-same-property-are-challenged-court-fee-payable-only-on-principal-relief-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
When Multiple Documents On Same Property Are Challenged, Court Fee Payable Only On Principal Relief: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that when multiple documents on the same property are challenged, court fee is payable only on the principal relief.

06 November, 2025 03:40 PM

TOP STORIES

conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM
activists-claim-they-only-called-for-peaceful-protests-seek-bail-in-sc
Trending Judiciary
Activists claim they only called for peaceful protests, seek bail in SC

Activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others tell SC they only called for peaceful anti-CAA protests, deny conspiracy in 2020 Delhi riots, seek bail under UAPA.

01 November, 2025 04:19 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-centre-eds-response-on-bhupesh-baghels-son-plea-against-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to Centre, ED's response on Bhupesh Baghel's son plea against arrest

SC issues notice to Centre & ED on plea by ex-Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel’s son challenging his ED arrest in alleged liquor scam; ED asked to reply in 10 days.

01 November, 2025 04:29 PM
no-exemption-of-personal-appearance-of-chief-secretaries-in-stray-dogs-case-sc
Trending Judiciary
No exemption of personal appearance of Chief Secretaries in stray dogs case: SC

SC refuses exemption from physical appearance of Chief Secretaries in stray dog menace case; directs them to appear physically on Nov 3, citing non-compliance.

01 November, 2025 04:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email