38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC: Final Hearing in Maratha Reservation Case Will Begin From March 17; Refused To Stay Bombay HC Order

By LawStreet News Network      05 February, 2020 11:02 PM      0 Comments
SC: Final Hearing in Maratha Reservation Case Will Begin From March 17; Refused To Stay Bombay HC Order

On February 5, 2020 a Supreme Court division bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Deepak Gupta said that final hearing in Maratha reservation case will begin from March 17, 2020 and refused to give any interim stay order. It said there is already an interim order passed by the apex court that any appointments made will be subject to the outcome of the batch of petitions.

"We will hear on March 17, 2020, no adjournment will be granted and all pleadings will be completed by then. We will hear the matter finally and pass the order. We are not staying it. Already there is an order that all appointments will be subject to the outcome of this petition," said the Apex Court.

Advocate Sanjeet Shukla, a representative of "Youth for Equality", said the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, enacted to grant reservation to the Maratha community people in jobs and education, breached the 50% ceiling on reservation fixed by the top court in its judgment in the case of Indira Sawhney v. Union Of India.

During the hearing of the case in the top court, Senior Advocate Gopal Shankar Narayan appearing for the petitioner asked the bench to stay the High Court order as the reservation today is 65 % in education and 62 % in jobs, exceeding 50 % cap in total reservation.

"We make it clear that the order of the High Court on reservation will not have retrospective effect,"the apex court had said when one of the lawyers alleged that the state government has passed an order applying the quota to nearly 70,000 vacancies with effect from 2014.

Following many agitations by Maratha community demanding reservation. Maharashtra government on November 30, 2020 enacted Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 to grant reservation to the Maratha community people in jobs and admissions. Through this enactment government provided 16 percent reservation to Maratha community which exceeds 50% bar set by Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney case. Following which many petitions were filed challenging constitutional validity of the act.

Bombay High Court division bench of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre in their judgement on June 17, 2019, uphold constitutional validity of SEBC Act and directed Maharashtra Government to reduce 16% reservation to 12-13%, as recommended by the State Backward Classes Commission. The court in its judgement said that state government on special circumstances can exceed the bar of 50% set by Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney case.

 

Author Satwik Sharma



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email