38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, September 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Section 362 CrPC: There Is Difference Between Recall And Review Rules Allahabad HC Recalling An Order [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      23 September, 2019 09:45 PM      0 Comments

The Allahabad High Court on September 19, 2019, in the case of Jaspreet Singh Garewal v. State of U.P. and Another, has recalled an order passed in a criminal case by observing that under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, there is a difference between recall and review.

A single judge Bench of Justice Rajeev Misra while hearing an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, observed that Section 362 of the Code only applies for review and does not bar recall of orders.

As per Section 362 CrPC no court, when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error.

To recall the order, the court referred to a Supreme Court judgment in Vishnu Agarwal v. State of U.P. wherein it was observed: "There is a distinction between ...... a review petition and a recall petition. While in a review petition, the Court considers on merits whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record, in a recall petition the Court does not go into the merits but simply recalls an order which was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to an affected party."

The court also referred to a single Bench judgment of the High Court in Jawahar Lal @ Jawahar Lal Jalaj v. State of U.P. whereby it was held that application for restoration or recall of the order is maintainable and the prohibition of Section 362 CrPC do not apply in the petitions, which have been dismissed in default without discussing the merits of the case because it do not come within the prohibition of 'alter' or 'review' of judgment, which has entirely a different meaning.

In the present case, the court noted that while passing the order, the opposite party was not represented by any counsel nor notices were issued to him before finally deciding the application.

In view of the above, the court observed: "The Apex Court in case of Vishnu Agarwal (Supra) and judgement of learned Single Judge in Jawahar Lal (Supra) have reiterated that there is difference between recall and review. By seeking recall of order dated 15.12.2016, opposite party No.2 is not seeking review of order dated 15.12.2016 and therefore bar contained in section 362 Cr.P.C. will not come in way. Consequently, I am of the considered opinion that order dated 15.12.2016, is liable to be recalled at the behest of opposite party No.2, who admittedly was not afforded any notice or opportunity of hearing before order dated 15.12.2016 was passed."

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-to-schedules-udhayanidhi-stalins-plea-to-club-firs-over-controversial-sanatan-dharma
Trending Judiciary
SC Schedules Udhayanidhi Stalin’s Plea to Club FIRs Over Controversial Sanatan Dharma Remarks in 2026

SC schedules hearing in 2026 on Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to club FIRs over his controversial ‘Sanatan Dharma’ remarks filed across multiple states.

02 September, 2025 11:01 AM
deliberate-concealment-of-absence-of-uterus-constitutes-fraud-under-section-12-1-c-of-the-hindu-marriage-act
Trending Judiciary
Deliberate Concealment Of Absence Of Uterus Constitutes Fraud Under Section 12 (1)(C) Of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds annulment of marriage, ruling concealment of absence of uterus amounts to fraud under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act.

02 September, 2025 11:13 AM
sole-intention-of-legislature-in-passing-probation-laws-is-to-give-persons-a-chance-of-reformation
Trending Judiciary
Sole Intention Of Legislature In Passing Probation Laws Is To Give Persons A Chance Of Reformation: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC grants probation under Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, stressing reform over jail for first-time offenders of minor offences.

02 September, 2025 11:22 AM
jharkhand-hc-orders-affidavit-on-custodial-deaths-seeks-compliance-with-enquiry-procedures
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Orders Affidavit on Custodial Deaths, Seeks Compliance with Enquiry Procedures [Read Order]

Jharkhand HC directs Home Dept Secretary to file affidavit on custodial deaths since 2018, ensuring compliance with mandatory enquiry procedures.

02 September, 2025 12:41 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email