38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Touching of Bum is not mere teasing: POCSO Court upon charging 22-yr Old for Sexual Assault

By Namya Bose      22 February, 2021 03:56 PM      0 Comments
Touching of Bum is not mere teasing

A Special Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Court in Bombay Held that touching of the backside or posterior of a person is also to be considered sexual assault under the provisions of the section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code 1869.

The case is to do with a 22 yr old man who was accused of touching a minor girl thus being tried for the gestures with sexual intent to outrage the childs modesty. The case deals with the alleged abuse of child that took place when a girl was walking towards a temple and a group of four boys approached her and one of the guys, wearing a black T-shirt touched her private part. 

The term private part as laid down in the provisions of law in India is to be observed and interpreted in a way that the society sees it, the court said. Sexual Assault was defined under section 7 of the POCSO Act, the court commented, the touching of bum of the girl obviously cannot t said to be without sexual intent. 

The accused denied the happening of any such incident further putting forth the argument that there was no record of any eye-witness or any statement from the other three boys present from the scenario that the victim described. The defendant argued, someones bum is not a private part as the victim claims, also challenging the FIR that stated teasing and not touching and there is a massive difference between the two. The Court responded to such submissions saying touching of the posterior is not mere teasing-

"The victim in her language said to her parents and before the police that accused had touched her private part. At the relevant time, she was hardly 10 years old. So she in her language expressed her ordeal. So there cannot be any confusion that she was not only teased but had been touched inappropriately by the accused."

Rejecting the arguments of the accused, the court declared -

Accused by touching or patting on her, bums, has committed the act with full knowledge and intention to outrage her modesty and to assault her sexually

Section 7, POCSO Act states:

"Whoever, with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anus or breast of the child or makes the child touch the vagina, penis, anus or breast of such person or any other person, or does any other act with sexual intent which involves physical contact without penetration is said to commit sexual assault."

Referring to section 7, the accused persons action obviously had sexual intent thus falling under the description of sexual assault. The Court then added, Sexual intention is the state of mind, may not necessarily to be proved by direct evidence, such intention is to be inferred from the attending circumstances of the case.

The Bombay Bench makes reference to the famous butt-slapping case of 1988 where the High Court of Punjab and Haryana convicted the accused under Section 354 (outraging the modesty of a woman) and Section 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult a lady) of the IPC for slapping a womans posterior. The Supreme Court later confirmed this conviction as well.

With the matter at hand, the bench of the Bombay POCSO Court said,

"As the victim was child 10 years old on the date of incident, provision of POCSO Act attracts for the similar kind of his act touching the posterior of the victim. Thus the prosecution has succeeded in proving that the accused has committed the said act with sexual intention and outraged her modesty."

With regard to the argument of not having any eye-witnesses on record, the Court said, that -

Very few people like to involve in such incident even though incident has been seen by them. So merely for the reason that there are no eye witnesses to the incident and that the friend who was with the prosecutrix has not been examined, cannot be the reason to discard and disregard the testimony of the victim girl."

Further the bench goes on to criticizing the police on their investigation on not even attempting to find the black T-shirt to confirm the identity of the accused.

The Court further added;

Victim has pointed the particular boy to her father wearing black T-shirt. It is a matter of record that the police didn't recover the said black T-shirt from the accused to confirm his identity. To me, it is the set back in the investigation of the police and innocent victim is not supposed to pay its cost.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

words-spreads-faster-than-winds-sc-relies-on-testimony-of-neighbour-acquits-woman-in-dowry-harassment-case
Trending Judiciary
'Words spreads faster than winds,' SC relies on testimony of neighbour; acquits woman in dowry harassment case [Read Judgment]

SC acquits woman in dowry case, citing neighbour’s testimony: “Word spreads faster than wind” — conviction under Section 498A set aside.

30 August, 2025 05:54 PM
sc-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-use-of-temples-land-funds-for-building-college-in-chennai
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to entertain plea against use of temples' land, funds for building college in Chennai

SC refuses plea against use of Chennai temples’ land, ₹25 cr funds for building college, says using temple assets for education not improper.

30 August, 2025 06:01 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM
18-former-judges-write-to-union-home-minister-amit-shah-criticizing-his-remarks-on-justice-b-sudershan-reddy
Trending Judiciary
18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

18 ex-judges write to Union HM Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy, stressing judicial independence and dignity.

25 August, 2025 03:09 PM
sc-stays-investigation-into-firs-against-csds-co-director-sanjay-kumar
Trending Judiciary
SC stays investigation into FIRs against CSDS co director Sanjay Kumar

SC stays probe into FIRs against CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar over Maharashtra polling data post; says multiple cases show harassment motive.

25 August, 2025 03:14 PM
influencers-indulging-in-commercial-speech-cant-claim-fundamental-right-sc
Trending CelebStreet
Influencers indulging in commercial speech can't claim fundamental right: SC

SC: Influencers making commercial speech can’t claim fundamental rights; must apologize and act responsibly towards community sensitivities.

25 August, 2025 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email