38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Vague allegations regarding harassment prima facie do not establish offence Us. 498A Indian Penal Code , 1860 : Andhra Pradesh High Court

By Komal Kinger      26 March, 2022 04:21 PM      0 Comments
Vague allegations regarding harassment prima facie Andhra Pradesh High Court

When there are no specific allegations made against the husband's family in a dowry harassment case, the Honble Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that it prima facie does not constitute a crime under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The said allegations prima facie do not constitute any offence punishable under Section 498A IPC. Except the said vague allegation, there are no specific allegations made against these petitioners regarding the harassment said to have been caused by them to the deceased by making any illegal demands for additional dowry etc.

Brief Facts of the case

The petitioners were charged under sections 498A[1] (punishment for husband or relative of husband subjecting women to cruelty), 306 (abetment to suicide)[2], and 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) [3]of the Indian Penal Code 1860. 

This Criminal Petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[4], is filed to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest.

A court order that allows a person to be released on bail before being arrested. In this case The person is not arrested before the bail is granted , which is known as anticipatory bail. A person can apply for this type of bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973. The Sessions Court and the High Court are the only two courts that can issue it. 

As per the version of prosecution first accused was the husband of the deceased and the second and third accused were the parents of the husband . It was contended that husband along with his parents are subjected the deceased to cruelty with illegal demands . Unable to bear the said harassment, she has committed suicide by hanging 

The Counsel for petitioners/accused submitted that only vague allegations were made against the parents and they were falsely implicated in the crime. Therefore, they prayed  for grant of anticipatory bail . 

According to  Additional Public Prosecutor  there were  certain allegations that were made against these petitioners/ accused  stating that they used to harass the deceased as they did not like her marrying their son and as such unable to bear the said harassment that she has committed suicide. Therefore, they  prayed  for dismissal of the Criminal Petition.

 

The Honble Court Observed that 

As can be seen from the record, there are no specific allegations made against these petitioners regarding the alleged harassment said to have been caused by them to the deceased by making any demand for any additional dowry. The only allegation that was made is that the petitioners did not like the deceased marrying A-1 ( Husband )  and as such they used to make comments against her in this regard and used to harass her. The said allegations prima facie do not constitute any offence punishable under Section 498A IPC. Except the said vague allegation, there are no specific allegations made against these petitioners regarding the harassment said to have been caused by them to the deceased by making any illegal demands for additional dowry etc. Therefore, in the said facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners are entitled for pre-arrest bail. 

 

JUDGEMENT 

Resultantly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioners in the above crime, they shall be forthwith released on bail on execution of self-bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties ". 

 

Case Title: Gudimetla Srinivasulu Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case Number CR.P No.1487 OF 2022


[1] Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code

[498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means

(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.]

[2] Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code

306. Abetment of suicide.If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

[3] Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code

37 [34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.]

[4] Section 438 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

438. Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest.

(1) When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non- bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under this section; and that Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail.

(2) When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub- section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including-

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;

(iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub- section (3) of section 437, as if the bail were granted under that section.

(3) If such person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station on such accusation, and is prepared either at the time of arrest or at any time while in the custody of such officer to give bail, be shall be released on bail; and if a Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should issue in the first instance against that person, he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the direction of the Court under sub- section (1).

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court

order,a 11-judge bench assembled to suspend it after observing that Justice Kumar's observations as judicial and administrative overreach. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Justice Rakesh Kumar, AG Subrahmanyam Sriram

Andhra Pradesh High Court permits Anandaiahs Ayurvedic concoction for COVID patients Andhra Pradesh High Court permits Anandaiahs Ayurvedic concoction for COVID patients

The Court directed Anandaiah and the district administration to discuss ways to manage COVID and to ensure a smooth flow of the medicines. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement, Andhra Pradesh High Court order

Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centres response on insufficient allocation of resources for treatment of Mucormycosis Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centres response on insufficient allocation of resources for treatment of Mucormycosis

to be fully equipped with the required man-power to handle the situation. In view of this, the Court directed the State to file a memo with regard to steps taken by it with regard to recruitment of paramedical staff. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court order, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement

Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centre and State Governments response on PIL seeking Optical Fibre Network, IT Infrastructure for District Courts Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centre and State Governments response on PIL seeking Optical Fibre Network, IT Infrastructure for District Courts

The Himachal Pradesh High Court had recently observed that, the need of the hour is to provide adequate bandwidth, network-attached storage and routers etc. to facilitate the conducting of educational courses, conferences, court proceedings etc. on virtual platform. Andhra Pradesh High Court order, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement, Fibre Network in India, IT Infrastructure components

TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-142-to-ensure-functioning-of-consumer-commissions-in-smaller-states-seeks-sgs-assistance
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 142 To Ensure Functioning Of Consumer Commissions In Smaller States, Seeks SG’s Assistance [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure consumer commissions function in smaller states, directs High Court judges to hear pending cases.

14 February, 2026 03:34 PM
madras-hc-upholds-life-sentence-for-church-pastor-convicted-of-sexual-assault-on-minor-with-disability
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Upholds Life Sentence for Church Pastor Convicted of Sexual Assault on Minor with Disability [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds life sentence of church pastor convicted under POCSO for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl with intellectual disability.

14 February, 2026 04:40 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email