38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 19, 2024

Value of Goods and Services ‘Paid’ as consideration Determine Pecuniary Jurisdiction [READ ORDER]

By Lakshya Tewari      07 September, 2020 07:47 PM      0 Comments
Value of Goods and Services ‘Paid’ as consideration Determine Pecuniary Jurisdiction [READ ORDER]

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) held in a order that the pecuniary jurisdiction of Consumers for a is to be determined by the value of goods/services “paid” as consideration without including the value of goods/services “purchased”. 

The consumer complaint was filed by a Kolkata based factory against its insurer, National Insurance Company Ltd. The case was of M/S. Pyaridevi Chabirajn Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. The complaint was that the applicant had wrongly repudiated their insurance claim worth, Rs.28,00,20,000/- which was purchased by the company by paying a premium of Rs.4,43,562/-. 

The commission opined that the value of the consideration paid in the present case was “less” than Rs.10,00,00,000/- (pecuniary jurisdiction of NDCRC, as per Section 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 which states that:- “complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as consideration exceeds rupees ten crores”, it had to be determined whether the complaint shall be maintainable before it.

The court observed that since this case is governed under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, NCDRC has the jurisdiction over the matter as the pecuniary jurisdiction in the matter where the Act of 1986 is applied is determined by “value of the goods or services and compensation”, it means that the value of goods or services and also the compensation would be added to reach a conclusion as to whether the National Commission has the jurisdiction or not. Section 21(a)(i) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, under this the National Commission have the jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the goods or services and compensation claimed exceeded Rs.1,00,00,000/-, whereas, under the new law, the National Commission has jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of goods or services paid as consideration exceeds Rs.10,00,00,000/-. 

The change was done so that the consumer can reach the appropriate Consumer Fora. In the Act of 1986 if a person agrees to purchase anything for Rs.60,00,000/- and later he approached the Consumer Forum seeking a refund along with compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- then the value will exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- and the Consumer Complaint was filed before the National Commission. 

The order was passed by the bench of Justice RK Agrawal (President) and Dr, SM Kantikar (Member), the bench said:-

“It appears that the Parliament while enacting the Act 0f 2019 was conscious of this fact and to ensure that Consumer should approach the appropriate Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission whether it is District, State or National only the value of the consideration while determining the pecuniary jurisdiction and not the value of goods or services and compensation, and that is why a specific provision has been made in Section34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) providing for the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, and National Commission respectively”.



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Judiciary
'We all know what happened when there were ballot papers,' SC on return of ballot papers or 100% VVPATs count

SC questions EVM process, debates ballot paper return and 100% VVPAT count verification, citing past issues.

18 April, 2024 01:53 PM


Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email