38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'We all know what happened when there were ballot papers,' SC on return of ballot papers or 100% VVPATs count

By Jhanak Sharma      18 April, 2024 01:53 PM      0 Comments
We all know what happened when there were ballot papers SC on return of ballot papers or 100 VVPATs count

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought to know from the Election Commission entire process of voting and counting through EVMs, while voicing doubt over return to ballot papers or 100 % cross verification of EVM votes with VVPAT (Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails) slips.

Also Read -  Supreme Court notice on plea to tally every EVM vote with VVPAT slips

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said, "We are in our 60s what we have seen (in the past), we have not forgotten. We all know what happened when there were ballot papers, you may have, but we have not forgotten".

Arguing for NGO Association for Democratic Reforms, advocate Prashant  Bhushan said most of the European countries which opted for voting through EVMs (Electronic Voting Machines) have returned to the paper ballots.

He gave an example of Germany.

"What is the population of Germany? Our country can't be compared with any European country. The population of even my state, West Bengal, is greater than any of the European countries. We need to repose some trust and faith on somebody. Do not try to bring down the system like this," Justice Datta observed.

Bhushan sought a direction to allow the voter to physically take the VVPAT slip, deposit it in the ballot box.

Also Read - Election Commission Opposes 100% VVPAT Verification, Citing Concerns About Reverting to Paper Ballots [Read Order] 

"If there is a mismatch between VVPAT and EVM, they only let VVPAT count prevail in that polling station," Bhushan said.

The bench, however, said human intervention in the polling and counting process could lead to further problems and biases.

Senior advocates Huzefa Ahmadi, Anand Grover, Santosh Paul and Sanjay Hegde, for some petitioners, said that it was very much important to ensure free and fair elections and a few days delay involved in VVPAT verification is a smaller price to pay.

Paul said that there should be atleast 50% VVPAT verification.

During the course of the hearing, the apex court also asked some questions to the ECI ad to whether CCTV cameras are installed at all polling booths.

The court fixed the matter for further hearing on April 18.

Also Read - Supreme Court Seeks Election Commission's Response on Cross Verification of EVMs with VVPATs Plea



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email