38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, October 03, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Judiciary

Weakness In Defence Cannot Become Strength Of The Prosecution: SC [Read Judgment]

By Lawstreet News Network      Aug 07, 2019      0 Comments      1,680 Views
Weakness In Defence Cannot Become Strength Of The Prosecution: SC [Read Judgment]

In Anand Ramachandra Chougule v. Sidarai Laxman Chougala, the Supreme Court reiterated on August 6, 2019, that weakness in the defence taken cannot become the strength of the prosecution and that the benefit of doubt must follow unless the prosecution is able to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt.

The observation was made by a Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha while dismissing appeals filed against the order passed by the High Court wherein it had acquitted the accused in a murder case by granting them the benefit of doubt.

In this case, the Bench noted that the burden lies on the prosecution to prove the allegations beyond all reasonable doubt and that the accused has only to create a doubt about the prosecution case and the probability of its defence.

It said: "An accused is not required to establish or prove his defence beyond all reasonable doubt, unlike the prosecution. If the accused takes a defence, which is not improbable and appears likely, there is material in support of such defence, the accused is not required to prove anything further. The benefit of doubt must follow unless the prosecution is able to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt."

Further, the court observed that the fact that a defence may not have been taken by an accused under Section 313, Cr.P.C. again cannot absolve the prosecution from proving its case beyond all reasonable doubt. If there are materials which the prosecution is unable to answer, the weakness in the defence taken cannot become the strength of the prosecution to claim that in the circumstances it was not required to prove anything, it said.

The court also said that the failure of the prosecution to investigate the F.I.R. lodged by the accused with regard to the same occurrence or to place their injury reports on record has caused serious prejudice to them.

Thus, upholding the judgment passed by the High Court, the Bench said: "Fair criminal trial encompasses a fair investigation at the pre-trial stage, a fair trial where the prosecution does not conceal anything from the court and discharges its obligations in accordance with law impartially to facilitate a just and proper decision by the court in the larger interest of justice concluding with a fairness in sentencing also."

[Read Judgment]



Tags:
Supreme Court of India
Share this article:


Lawstreet News Network
Editor
     



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES


ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email