38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Wife disowned after govt job; difficult to find match for daughter of divorcee,' SC rejects man's plea; grants divorce [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      08 May, 2025 02:15 PM      0 Comments
Wife disowned after govt job difficult to find match for daughter of divorcee SC rejects mans plea grants divorce

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has granted divorce to a couple on ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage, despite vehement resistance from the man that his wife had disowned him getting public employment, though he made a huge contributions for it, and it would be difficult to get a groom for their daughter due to stigma attached to it.

A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan said that it is a fit case to invoke powers conferred by Article 142 of the Constitution and to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage due to the prolonged period of separation as the parties lived separately since 2008.

The court was also not convinced with the man's pleadings that it would be difficult to marry his daughter, undergoing MBBS studies, in the rural set up of Bihar as no respectable family would agree to give in marriage their son with the child of a divorcee.

"She is approaching marriageable age. We found her sufficiently mature to make her own decisions," the bench said after personally interacting with the daughter virtually.

The bench also found multiple attempts at reconciliation among the parties have failed, indicating no possibility of reunion.

It also noted the age of the parties as both are quinquagenarian.

The court also did not order for any alimony as the wife did not make any claim for it.

To the man's plea against granting divorce as it would not be in the best interest of the child, the bench said, "We are not impressed by this submission, especially in light of the fact that the respondent-husband and his daughter have had no contact during the entire period of separation. To us, this appears to be a mere attempt to prolong the litigation and stall the inevitable".

The husband vehemently opposed dissolution of marriage contending that none of the available grounds on which a Hindu marriage could be dissolved was present.

The bench, however, said, "The same is not a bar for us to exercise our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution; more particularly when we are satisfied that it is a case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage".  

The court allowed a petition by the woman, working as a Child Development Project Officer, against the Patna High Court's order refusing her plea for divorce and allowing the mans plea for restitution of conjugal relations.

The marriage between the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband was solemnised on April 24, 1999. They were blessed with a daughter on June 7, 2001. According to the appellant-wife, they have been living separately since 2008 while the respondent-husband claims that the separation is since 2012.

The appellant-wife ruled out any scope for such reconciliation and insisted for a decree of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

The respondent husband said he was more than willing to have resumption of marital relationship particularly for the future of the child. He contended that the petitioner-wife started showing her true colours once she obtained public employment.

He claimed he had huge contributions for what the appellant-wife is today. Not only was she encouraged by him to prepare for securing public employment, the entire expenses for her to live a dignified, fulfilling and meaningful life were borne by him. Conveniently, she repudiated the contribution of the respondent-husband and disowned him after such employment.

The man further contended in light of the socio-economic conditions of the rural area from where the respondent-husband hails, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to find a suitable groom for his child. Having regard to the stigma that is attached with a divorce, no respectable family would agree to give in marriage their son with the child of a divorcee, his counsel said.

The wife, on the other hand, contended that the child of the parties has since grown up and she is an adult, pursuing her medical course. She said the respondent-husband never cared for his child and all expenses for her up-bringing as well as education have been borne by the appellant-wife. That apart, she said, she was an aspirant for public employment even before her marriage. With great deal of personal effort and without anyone’s assistance she could secure public employment, she said.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email