38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Wife Living Separately Cannot File Case Under Domestic Violence Act Against In-Laws [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      21 June, 2019 12:00 AM      1 Comments
>Wife Living Separately Cannot File Case Under Domestic Violence Act Against In-Laws [Read Judgment]

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on June 18, 2019, in the case of Kuldeep Singh and Others v. Rekha has held that if wife and husband leaves the shared household to establish their own household, the domestic relationship comes to an end in respect of parents and therefore complaint under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, cannot be maintained against them.

A single judge Bench of Justice S.K. Awasthi passed the order on a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973, for quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 12 of the DV Act pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore.

In this case, after the marriage, the wife came to her matrimonial house situated at Gwalior and resided with the family members of her husband. It was stated that in the year 2011 her husband got a job at Tresure Island, Indore and in the year 2012 her husband shifted to Delhi and they started living there. When they were living at Indore and Delhi, her in-laws came there and demanded Rs.22,000,00/- and harassed her. This led the wife to file a complaint under the DV Act against several persons including her husband and his mother & father.

On perusal of the records, the High Court observed that “The aforesaid documents clearly established that after sometime of the marriage, respondent No.1 and her husband moved out joint family and established their own households at Indore and Delhi.”

It further observed, “In this regard the provision of Domestic Violence Act is to be taken into account. Under the Domestic Violence Act the first per-condition is that the applicant must be an aggrieved person is a person defined in Section 2(a) of the Act. The domestic relationship must be there between the aggrieved person and respondent to invoke Domestic Violence Act.”

In view of the above, the High Court allowed the said petition in part and quashed the case against the in-laws. It said, “This Court has carefully gone through the complaint preferred under Section 12 of the DV Act, and in the considered opinion of this Court, that in the present case, after sometime of the marriage the respondent gone with her husband leaves the share households to establish their own households at Indore and Delhi, and as a result domestic relationship comes to an end, therefore proceedings based upon the complaint initiated in the matter pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class- Indore is not maintainable against the applicant No.2 to 8 and deserves to be quashed.”

[Read Judgment]

Share this article:

User Avatar

John Doe
Amit Mar 08, 2020

Right to women bullshit when in india all laws are based on equality then these women biased law are misused by women only making money. Marriage is a holy relationship between men and women and it takes time to growth smoothly but now these days women has no patience and wear and tearable matters of family which involves all family in india cause the hurt of ego of women and then these law are using as weapon against men. But they forget fake cases not survive in court. I would say that freedom and liberty has to limit at last when life become hell of women then she understands creation of family not a easy task. I must say respect each other we all men and women are equal in society we stop the feminism mispresentation in society.

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Trending Judiciary
SC rebukes IMA chief; rejects apology for remarks

SC rebukes IMA chief R V Asokan; rejects his apology for remarks against the court in contempt proceedings involving Baba Ramdev and Patanjali's MD Acharya Balkrishna.

15 May, 2024 11:02 AM
Trending Judiciary
Can't allow parole for having procreation with live-in partner: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC denied parole for a convict seeking procreation with a live-in partner, stating it would set a harmful precedent, considering his legal marriage and children.

15 May, 2024 12:19 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC declares arrest of Newsclick's Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha as invalid

SC declares Newsclick Editor-in-chief Prabir Purkayastha's arrest invalid. He was detained in October 2023 under UAPA for alleged pro-China propaganda. SC orders release.

15 May, 2024 12:30 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain plea for direction to EC to act against PM, BJP leaders

SC rejects plea seeking Election Commission action against PM and BJP leaders for alleged hate speeches during elections.

15 May, 2024 12:55 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email