38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Wife Living Separately Cannot File Case Under Domestic Violence Act Against In-Laws [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      21 June, 2019 12:00 AM      1 Comments
>Wife Living Separately Cannot File Case Under Domestic Violence Act Against In-Laws [Read Judgment]

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on June 18, 2019, in the case of Kuldeep Singh and Others v. Rekha has held that if wife and husband leaves the shared household to establish their own household, the domestic relationship comes to an end in respect of parents and therefore complaint under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, cannot be maintained against them.

A single judge Bench of Justice S.K. Awasthi passed the order on a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973, for quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 12 of the DV Act pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore.

In this case, after the marriage, the wife came to her matrimonial house situated at Gwalior and resided with the family members of her husband. It was stated that in the year 2011 her husband got a job at Tresure Island, Indore and in the year 2012 her husband shifted to Delhi and they started living there. When they were living at Indore and Delhi, her in-laws came there and demanded Rs.22,000,00/- and harassed her. This led the wife to file a complaint under the DV Act against several persons including her husband and his mother & father.

On perusal of the records, the High Court observed that The aforesaid documents clearly established that after sometime of the marriage, respondent No.1 and her husband moved out joint family and established their own households at Indore and Delhi.

It further observed, In this regard the provision of Domestic Violence Act is to be taken into account. Under the Domestic Violence Act the first per-condition is that the applicant must be an aggrieved person is a person defined in Section 2(a) of the Act. The domestic relationship must be there between the aggrieved person and respondent to invoke Domestic Violence Act.

In view of the above, the High Court allowed the said petition in part and quashed the case against the in-laws. It said, This Court has carefully gone through the complaint preferred under Section 12 of the DV Act, and in the considered opinion of this Court, that in the present case, after sometime of the marriage the respondent gone with her husband leaves the share households to establish their own households at Indore and Delhi, and as a result domestic relationship comes to an end, therefore proceedings based upon the complaint initiated in the matter pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class- Indore is not maintainable against the applicant No.2 to 8 and deserves to be quashed.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
Amit Mar 08, 2020

Right to women bullshit when in india all laws are based on equality then these women biased law are misused by women only making money. Marriage is a holy relationship between men and women and it takes time to growth smoothly but now these days women has no patience and wear and tearable matters of family which involves all family in india cause the hurt of ego of women and then these law are using as weapon against men. But they forget fake cases not survive in court. I would say that freedom and liberty has to limit at last when life become hell of women then she understands creation of family not a easy task. I must say respect each other we all men and women are equal in society we stop the feminism mispresentation in society.

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email