38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Wife’s insistence to live separately from parents amounts to cruelty: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Singh      25 August, 2023 01:49 PM      0 Comments
Wife’s insistence to live separately from parents amounts to cruelty: Delhi High Court

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court said a woman's "persistent insistence" on living separately from her in-laws without justification is torturous for husband and would be an act of cruelty, as it allowed divorce to a man.

A bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said that unlike the West, in India, it is not usual for the son to get separated from his family and his wife becomes integral to it.

"Normally, without any justifiable reason, she (wife) should never insist that her husband should get separated from the family and live with her separately," the court said.

The bench allowed the man's plea against a family court order refusing to grant divorce.

The man sought dissolution of marriage on several grounds under the Hindu Marriage Act, including that the wife was "quarrelsome" and did not show respect to the elders at the matrimonial home and insisted that he reside separately.

"No husband would like to be separated from his parents and other family members. The persistent efforts of the respondent wife to constrain the appellant to be separated from the family would be torturous for the husband and would constitute an act of cruelty," the bench said.

It said the wife "has not been able to show any justifiable reason for her insistence to have a separate residence... The only inference that can be drawn is that her insistence to live separately from the other family members was whimsical and had no justifiable reason. Such persistent insistence can only be termed as an act of cruelty."

The son has a moral and legal obligation to take care of his parents when they grow old, the court pointed out.

"In India, generally people do not subscribe to the western thought where, upon getting married or attaining majority, the son gets separa- ted from the family. In normal circumstances, the wife is expected to be a part of the family of the husband after marriage," the court said.

It said an acrimonious atmosphere at home cannot be a conducive for the parties to forge a cordial conjugal relationship and, the circumstances in the present case is bound to be a source of mental cruelty.

The court also relied upon a Supreme Court’s 2016 judgment in Narendra vs K Meena, which held that “it is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from the parents upon getting married at the instance of the wife.”

The court noted it is not disputed that she had left the matrimonial home on April 28, 2003 and when the appellant along with his sister went to the parental home of the respondent, her parents refused to send her back unless they live separately from the parents of the appellant. It was pursuant to a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 that an out of Court of settlement was reached between the parties and the respondent joined the matrimonial home. However, she again left the matrimonial home on July 20, 2007.

Advocates Nikhil Palli and Kshitij Pal, appeared for the husband and advocate R S Kela for the wife.


[Read Judgment]

Author - Jhanak Singh

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM


Trending Judiciary
Burden to prove dishonest damage to electric meter is for electricity theft, is on the prosecution: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court has held that the burden to prove that a person has ‘dishonestly’ damaged an electric meter to commit electricity theft is on the prosecution.

17 April, 2024 05:41 PM
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM
Trending Judiciary
After Karnataka HC, Delhi HC sets aside Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds [Read Judgement]

After Karnataka High Court, the Delhi High Court has set aside a Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds.

18 April, 2024 01:06 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email