38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Writ Petition Filed in The Kerala High Court Challenging The Constitutional Validity of Section V And Section VI of The New BCI Rules

By AISHWARYA GAIROLA      29 June, 2021 07:13 PM      0 Comments
WRIT PETITION FILED IN THE KERALA HIGH COURT CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF SECTION V AND SECTION VI OF THE NEW BCI RULES

A petition has been filed in the Kerala High Court by Advocate Rajesh Vijayan, through Advocate Santosh Mathew, against the Bar Council of India, challenging the constitutional validity of Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules, calling the impugned provisions as being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules, notified on June 25th, 2021, bars criticism or attack on the decision of any State Bar Council or the Bar Council of India in public domain. The writ petition submits before the court that the said provisions blatantly violate the right to freedom of speech and expression that is legally, judicially and fundamentally permissible.

The petition additionally calls the procedure prescribed for proceeding prescribed by the rules against Advocates and Bar Council members in violation of the basic principle of natural justice and alleged that the publishing them in the Gazette of India was an attempt to inhibit the exercise of free speech and expression. 

The petition highlighted that the impugned provisions are unconstitutional as the redressal mechanism leaves the final decision in the hand of the BCI having a chilling effect on the freedom of expression of Advocates. Furthermore, according to Section 49(1) of the Advocates Act, any change in the rules has to be mandatorily approved by the CJI and the said notification do not disclose if any approval has been obtained in this regard. It was also submitted that in the absence of any indication of the operation of rules, the fear of coercive action will lead to increased instances of self-censorship.

The impugned provisions, according to the provision, curbs the right to dissent and prayed that the court issue a writ of mandamus or any other direction declaring Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules are in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution and sought interim relief to stay the operation of the said provisions. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-directs-coal-india-to-create-supernumerary-post-for-visually-disabled-candidate-calls-disability-rights-part-of-csr
Trending Judiciary
SC Directs Coal India to Create Supernumerary Post for Visually Disabled Candidate, Calls Disability Rights Part of CSR

Supreme Court directs Coal India to create a supernumerary post for a visually disabled candidate, holding disability rights integral to corporate social responsibility.

16 January, 2026 04:55 PM
absence-of-motive-not-fatal-when-credible-dying-declaration-exists-restores-murder-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of Motive Not Fatal When Credible Dying Declaration Exists; Restores Murder Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court restores murder conviction, holding that absence of motive is not fatal when a credible and trustworthy dying declaration exists.

16 January, 2026 05:06 PM

TOP STORIES

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM
madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email