38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024
Judiciary

Writ Petition Filed in The Kerala High Court Challenging The Constitutional Validity of Section V And Section VI of The New BCI Rules

By AISHWARYA GAIROLA      29 June, 2021 07:13 PM      0 Comments
WRIT PETITION FILED IN THE KERALA HIGH COURT CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF SECTION V AND SECTION VI OF THE NEW BCI RULES

A petition has been filed in the Kerala High Court by Advocate Rajesh Vijayan, through Advocate Santosh Mathew, against the Bar Council of India, challenging the constitutional validity of Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules, calling the impugned provisions as being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules, notified on June 25th, 2021, bars criticism or attack on the decision of any State Bar Council or the Bar Council of India in public domain. The writ petition submits before the court that the said provisions blatantly violate the right to freedom of speech and expression that is legally, judicially and fundamentally permissible.

The petition additionally calls the procedure prescribed for proceeding prescribed by the rules against Advocates and Bar Council members in violation of the basic principle of natural justice and alleged that the publishing them in the Gazette of India was an attempt to inhibit the exercise of free speech and expression. 

The petition highlighted that the impugned provisions are unconstitutional as the redressal mechanism leaves the final decision in the hand of the BCI having a chilling effect on the freedom of expression of Advocates. Furthermore, according to Section 49(1) of the Advocates Act, any change in the rules has to be mandatorily approved by the CJI and the said notification do not disclose if any approval has been obtained in this regard. It was also submitted that in the absence of any indication of the operation of rules, the fear of coercive action will lead to increased instances of self-censorship.

The impugned provisions, according to the provision, curbs the right to dissent and prayed that the court issue a writ of mandamus or any other direction declaring Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the BCI Rules are in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution and sought interim relief to stay the operation of the said provisions. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

to-uphold-presumption-of-guilt-under-section-29-pocso-act-foundational-facts-must-be-proved-reiterates-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
To uphold presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO Act, foundational facts must be proved, reiterates Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reiterates that to uphold the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, the prosecution must prove the ‘foundational facts’ beyond reasonable doubt.

16 April, 2024 12:54 PM
baba-ramdev-acharya-balkrishna-offer-to-make-public-apology-in-sc-for-misleading-advertisements
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-sets-aside-judgment-upholding-arbitral-award-against-dmrc
Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-third-plea-for-arvind-kejriwals-removal-as-delhi-cm-blasts-petitioner-for-abuse-of-judicial-process
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
use-of-social-media-to-interfere-with-administration-of-justice-needs-serious-consideration-sc
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
two-day-conference-on-april-on-technology-and-dialogue-between-sc-and-singapore
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email