38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Know The Law

Introduction to Code of Criminal Procedure with Important definitions

By LawStreet News Network      19 December, 2017 01:01 AM      0 Comments

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is a procedural law, providing machinery for the punishment of offenders against the substantive criminal law. It prescribes the procedure for the trial of offences which the Indian Penal Code defines. Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that all offences under the Indian Penal Code shall be investigated, inquired into, tried, and otherwise dealt with according to the provision of this Code. It also provides that offences under a law other than the Indian Penal Code will also be tried according to the provisions of the Code.

Previous to 1882 there was no uniform law of criminal procedure for the whole India. The Criminal Procedure Code of 1882 for the first time gave it a uniform structure, which later on supplemented by a new Code in 1898, which became the basis of the present procedure.

The Act underwent drastic amendments in 1923 and 1955. However, demand for the revision of the Code was made to simplify the procedure and to make the separation of judiciary more effective. The Law Commission, therefore, submitted a revised draft of the Code in its thirteenth report which, was passed into this Code in 1973.

As held in the case of Popular Muthiah v. State, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is an exhaustive Code and is meant to further the ends of justice and not to frustrate the same.

Important Definitions under the Code

Bailable Offence and Non-bailable Offence

According to section 2(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bailable offence means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First Schedule of the code and non-bailable offence means any other offence.

In case of bailable offence, a person could claim to be released on bail as a matter of right, which is not the case in non-bailable offences.

Cognizable Offence and Non-cognizable Offence

Cognizable offences as per section 2(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are those offences in which the police officer can arrest a person without an arrest warrant and to proceed with the investigation without prior order of the magistrate.

A non-cognizable offence as per section 2(l) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is an offence in which the police officer has no authority to arrest a person without an arrest warrant and also cannot proceed with the investigation without an order of the magistrate.

Complaint

Complaint as per section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973means any allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

For a document to come within the ambit of this clause, the following conditions have to be satisfied:-

An oral or a written allegation

Some person known or unknown has committed an offence

It must be made to a magistrate

It must be made with an object that he should take action

As held in the case of Mohd. Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan, there is no particular format of a complaint. A petition addressed to a magistrate containing an allegation that an offence has been committed, and ending with a prayer that the culprit be suitably dealt with is a complaint.

Inquiry, Investigation and Trial

These three terms denote three different stages of a criminal case. The first is an investigation which is defined u/s 2(h) of the Code, where the evidence is collected by the police or any other person authorized by a magistrate. In accordance with the investigation, the police submit his report to the magistrate and then begins the second stage an inquiry or a trial. The inquiry is defined u/s 2 (g) of the Code; it is a stage which stops when the trial begins. The inquiry does not require an adjudication upon guilt or determination of an offence, which happens at the stage of the trial.

Now, stop scratching your head, whenever you come across a legal term.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email