38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Know The Law

How the Seventh Schedule Affects Delivery Of Public Goods

By Anurupa Biswas      19 January, 2022 03:53 PM      0 Comments
Seventh Schedule Affects Delivery Of Public Goods

The use of the expression "law and order" is very common and the terms of law and order have been used interchangeably for centuries. Though everyone understands the law, what exactly is order? Order is typically defined as the opposite of disorder. The order has a connotation of enforcing the law, whereas disorder has of breaking it. In other words, "order" requires the efficient functioning of the courts and police. Economists have a technical definition of "public good". 

Ignoring the narrow definition of public good, we understand public good as something that must be delivered by the government. It cannot and should not be delivered by the private sector. Notwithstanding the use of private security guards, most people will agree "law and order" is a public good. 

If not delivered efficiently by the government, in the real or reel world, the private sector may step in to fill the breach, with undesirable consequences. The expression "government" should not be used in the singular, since there are layers in our three-tiered structure of governance. Article 246 of the Indian Constitution mentions three lists in the Seventh Schedule Union, State and Concurrent lists.

Union - Falls under the parliament.

State - State Assemblies

Concurrent - Both State and Union can make laws for it.

Countervailing the pressure by citizens increasing demands for efficient delivery of such public goods. The duty of goods was passed to the local bodies. But without delegation of funds, functions and functionaries. They are presently left to the whims of state governments, and local governments are unable to respond. 

What is the need for a review of the Seventh Schedule List?

The Rajamannar Committee (formally known as Centre-State Relations Inquiry Committee) suggested the constitution of a High-Power Commission to examine the entries of Lists I and III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. And the redistribution of the entries,".

Changes in the past led to more centralisation: Items have moved from the state list to the concurrent list and from the concurrent list to the union list.

Such limited movements have reflected more centralisation, such as in 1976. N K Singh, Chairman of 15th Finance Commission has also often made this point, in addition to scrutiny of Article 282.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email