The Calcutta High Court held that an uncorroborated GD entry reporting a lost cheque cannot rebut the Section 139 NI Act presumption, while retaining ₹35,000 compensation.
Read Full ArticleThe Punjab and Haryana High Court held that a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act cannot be quashed merely because the accused's husband's company undertook to discharge the liability under a settlement agreement. The Court ruled that disputed questions regarding legally enforceable debt must be decided at trial.
The Gauhati High Court held that a cheque bounce notice 'advising' payment can constitute a valid demand under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if it clearly requires the drawer to pay.
Calcutta High Court set aside a six-month jail sentence in a cheque bounce case, holding that making the accused answer a different cheque transaction at the plea stage violated his right to a fair trial, while retaining ₹3 lakh compensation.
Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.
The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.
![Mere GD Entry Of Lost Cheque Insufficient To Rebut Section 139 NI Act Presumption: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2026/10/lj_4510_Lost_Cheque,_Law_and_Justice.webp)
![Gauhati HC: Polite 'Advice' to Pay Can Qualify as Demand Under Section 138 NI Act [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2026/08/lj_4453_Gauhati_HC_Polite_Advice_to.webp)
![Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/04/lj_7425_Cheque_Bounce_Case_Not.webp)
