CCPA penalises Shangri-La Eros ₹1 lakh for automatically levying a 10% service charge at Mister Chai, violating consumer rights and 2022 guidelines.
Read Full ArticleDelhi Consumer Commission condones a widow’s 250-day delay in challenging Tata AIG’s repudiation of a ₹25.73 lakh mediclaim.
Supreme Court rules that Sections 126–127 assessments govern reconnection in electricity theft cases but do not bind the Special Court’s civil liability finding.
CCPA penalises Britannia ₹1 lakh for misleading ‘100% Whole Wheat Bread’ claims despite the product containing only 62% wheat flour.
Gujarat Consumer Commission rules that a cricket association member paying fees for facilities qualifies as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act.
Delhi Consumer Commission holds Swiggy liable for misleading “cost for two” pricing on Dineout and restaurant liable for mandatory service charge, awarding ₹1 lakh compensation. The Indian Expre...
Supreme Court seeks Centre's affidavit on anomalies in determining consumer fora pecuniary jurisdiction based on consideration paid versus compensation claimed.
Chhattisgarh consumer court orders Maruti Suzuki to replace a Grand Vitara over E20 fuel damage in a first-of-its-kind ruling; company to appeal.
CCPA fines English Oven ₹1 lakh for misleading “100% Atta Bread” claim after finding the product contained only 87% whole wheat flour.
CCPA fines Storia Foods ₹1 lakh for misleading “100% Coconut Water” and “100% Juice” claims; orders immediate withdrawal and compliance report.
Amazon ordered to refund ₹1.43 lakh and pay ₹3.25 lakh compensation after delivering the wrong camera model and denying a refund, rules Darjeeling Consumer Commission.
Jalandhar Consumer Commission awards ₹15,000 compensation to a lawyer after a restaurant levied a service charge without consent, calling it an unfair trade practice.
Kerala High Court held that co-operative bank depositors can approach Consumer Forums for deposit recovery despite remedies under the Co-operative Societies Act.
CCPA fines PhysicsWallah Rs 5 lakh for dark patterns, misleading ads, pre-ticked donations, and forcing users to share personal data for free courses.
CCPA imposes ₹7 lakh penalty on Vajiram & Ravi for misleading UPSC result advertisements and concealing material course details of successful candidates.
Judiciary
Judiciary
Business
Judiciary