Calcutta High Court refuses to direct CESC to supply electricity to a dilapidated premises ordered to be demolished, citing serious public safety risks.
Read Full ArticleFrom corruption prosecutions and corporate criminal liability to taxation, equal pay, vehicle repossession and arbitration, here are seven key Supreme Court rulings from the week.
Supreme Court dismisses DVVNL’s appeal against a ₹57.74 lakh electricity demand raised in 2007 for 1998 dues, holding the demand unsustainable under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act.
The Supreme Court dismissed a DISCOM’s appeal, holding that its ₹57.74 lakh demand for Minimum Consumption Guarantee Charges relating to 1998 was barred by limitation under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act.
Supreme Court holds electricity boards are subject to strict liability, not absolute liability, for electrocution deaths and injuries, with recognised exceptions applying to determine liability.
Patna High Court quashes electricity theft FIR, holding that mere non-payment of dues does not constitute theft under Section 135 without proof of dishonest intention or meter tampering.
The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.
![No Electricity Supply Can Be Ordered For Premises Declared Dangerous: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2026/09/lj_5032_Electricity_Calcutta.jpg)
![Supreme Court Rejects ₹57.74 Lakh Electricity Demand As Time-Barred [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/09/lj_2772_ChatGPT_Image_Sep_11,_2026,_12_40_05_AM.webp)
![Electricity Boards Face Strict, Not Absolute Liability For Electrocution Deaths: SC [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/08/lj_4285_ChatGPT_Image_Aug_14,_2026,_02_17_45_AM.webp)
