Delhi Consumer Commission condones a widow’s 250-day delay in challenging Tata AIG’s repudiation of a ₹25.73 lakh mediclaim.
Read Full ArticleThe Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore condones a 1,093-day delay in filing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, holding that a litigant should not suffer for a lawyer’s failure to advise him to challenge an ex parte decree. The Court imposes ₹50,000 in costs and remands the matter for consideration on merits.
The Supreme Court dismissed a DISCOM’s appeal, holding that its ₹57.74 lakh demand for Minimum Consumption Guarantee Charges relating to 1998 was barred by limitation under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ₹20.18 crore customs duty adjudication against GKEM International, holding that the Order-in-Original was passed within the limitation period under Sections 28(9) and 28(9A) of the Customs Act.
Allahabad High Court holds that an Advocate's claim for unpaid professional fees is contractual and cannot ordinarily be enforced through writ jurisdiction where the liability is disputed.
Supreme Court rules that time spent in winding-up proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for a separate money recovery suit, as the two remedies are fundamentally differ...
The Supreme Court held that limitation for filing a probate application begins when the right to apply accrues, not on the testator's death, and restored a probate petition rejected as time-barred.
Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.
The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.
![Clinical Depression Constitutes Sufficient Cause to Condonе 250-Day Delay: Delhi Consumer Commission [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/10/lj_3232_Clinical_Depression_Constitutes.webp)
![Litigant Should Not Suffer For Lawyer’s Mistake, Condones 1,093-Day Delay: MP High Court [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2026/10/lj_5417_Madhya_Pradesh_High_Court_Delay_Condoned.webp)
![Supreme Court Rejects ₹57.74 Lakh Electricity Demand As Time-Barred [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/09/lj_2772_ChatGPT_Image_Sep_11,_2026,_12_40_05_AM.webp)
![Customs Adjudication Within Limitation Despite ₹20.18 Crore Duty Demand: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/09/lj_5457_ChatGPT_Image_Sep_10,_2026,_03_28_48_AM.webp)
![Winding-Up Proceedings Cannot Extend Limitation For Later Money Recovery Suit : SC [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/08/lj_5162_ChatGPT_Image_Aug_13,_2026,_03_14_06_AM.webp)
![Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2025/10/lj_6383_Limitation_for_Continuous.webp)
