The Supreme Court held that employees subsequently regularised are entitled to count their pre-regularisation service as qualifying service for pension, allowing them to remain outside the post-01.01.2004 pension regime.
Read Full ArticleThe Tripura High Court held that a divorced daughter can claim family pension even if the divorce decree was granted after her father’s death, directing payment from the date of divorce.
Madras High Court sets aside a CAT order granting family pension to a Railway employee's step-son, holding he falls outside the definition of "family" under Rule 75 of the Pension Rules.
Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.
Delhi High Court upholds pension rights for ASI temporary employees, ruling against long-term exploitation and misuse of contractual employment. Advocates Anu Mehta and Rubinder Ghumman represented the petitioners and argued against employee exploitation.
Punjab & Haryana HC upholds disability pension rights for military personnel, emphasizing the presumption of service-related health deterioration.
The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.
![Step-Son Not "Family" Under Railway Pension Rules, Holds Madras HC [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2026/07/lj_3362_ChatGPT_Image_Jul_10,_2026,_01_49_01_AM.webp)
![Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2026/01/lj_6112_Delhi_HC_Upholds_Family_Pension.webp)
![Delhi High Court grants pension rights to long-serving temporary ASI employees, slams non-regularisation [Read judgment]](/secure/uploads/2025/02/lj_5638_Delhi_High_Court_grants_pension.webp)
