Sabarimala Reference Day 15: Supreme Court Debates Limits of Essential Religious Practices Test and Religious Freedom.
Read Full ArticleSabarimala Reference Day 16: Senior Advocates tell Supreme Court religion cannot be tested on secular yardsticks under Articles 14 and 19.
Supreme Court hears Day 14 of the Sabarimala reference, examining essential religious practices, Article 25, and judicial restraint.
SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.
Sabarimala Reference Day 11: Respondents tell Supreme Court that denominational rights cannot override individual rights under Article 25.
Sabarimala hearing Day 9: SC examines non-believers’ entry, scope of Articles 25–26, and limits of religious freedom & denominational rights.
Sabarimala Reference Day 10 Senior Advocate Jaising Tells Supreme Court Constitution Is a Living Document Legislature Cannot Always Be Relied Upon for Reform”
Day 7 of Sabarimala hearing: SC debates Article 25 scope, ERP test, denominational rights, and limits of constitutional morality.
Adv. Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay tells Supreme Court Sabarimala is sui generis, defends age-based entry restriction & limits of Articles 25–26.
In order to control overcrowding and unauthorised entry at the Sabarimala during the upcoming festival season, the Kerala High Court has issued certain directions to respective authorities.
![Kerala High Court issues directions to curb Sabarimala overcrowding [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2023/12/lj_5854_Overcrowding_At_Sabarimala.jpg)
