Sabarimala Reference Day 15: Supreme Court Debates Limits of Essential Religious Practices Test and Religious Freedom.
Read Full ArticleSabarimala Reference Day 16: Senior Advocates tell Supreme Court religion cannot be tested on secular yardsticks under Articles 14 and 19.
SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.
Sabarimala Reference Day 11: Respondents tell Supreme Court that denominational rights cannot override individual rights under Article 25.
Sabarimala hearing Day 9: SC examines non-believers’ entry, scope of Articles 25–26, and limits of religious freedom & denominational rights.
Sabarimala Reference Day 10 Senior Advocate Jaising Tells Supreme Court Constitution Is a Living Document Legislature Cannot Always Be Relied Upon for Reform”
Sabarimala Reference Day 6: Bench Continues Hearing on Limits of Denominational Autonomy; Agamic Law and Drafting History of Articles 25–26 Debated
Kerala High Court upholds regulated access to the Sabarimala forest route, ruling that the mode of temple entry is not an essential religious practice.
![Kerala HC Upholds Restrictions on Sabarimala Forest Route, Says Trek Not Essential Religious Practice [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2025/11/lj_1677_Kerala_HC_Upholds_Restrictions.webp)
