Sabarimala Reference Day 16: Senior Advocates tell Supreme Court religion cannot be tested on secular yardsticks under Articles 14 and 19.
Read Full ArticleSC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.
Sabarimala hearing Day 9: SC examines non-believers’ entry, scope of Articles 25–26, and limits of religious freedom & denominational rights.
Sabarimala Reference Day 10 Senior Advocate Jaising Tells Supreme Court Constitution Is a Living Document Legislature Cannot Always Be Relied Upon for Reform”
Sabarimala Reference Day 6: Bench Continues Hearing on Limits of Denominational Autonomy; Agamic Law and Drafting History of Articles 25–26 Debated
Kerala High Court upholds regulated access to the Sabarimala forest route, ruling that the mode of temple entry is not an essential religious practice.
The Senior Citizen Rights Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to empower elderly citizens with clear and accessible knowledge of their legal and social rights in India.
![Kerala HC Upholds Restrictions on Sabarimala Forest Route, Says Trek Not Essential Religious Practice [Read Judgment]](/secure/uploads/2025/11/lj_1677_Kerala_HC_Upholds_Restrictions.webp)
