38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Admissions In Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Law Courses Will Be Through CLAT: SC

By LawStreet News Network      22 May, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Admissions In Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Law Courses Will Be Through CLAT: SC

The Supreme Court on May 21, 2019, has held that the law admissions to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) for the 2019-20 academic session can take place through the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT).

A Vacation Bench comprising of Justices Arun Mishra and M.R. Shah was hearing a petition filed by the GGSIPU against the order passed by the Delhi High Court wherein it had stayed the operation of an order and circular issued in February mandating the varsity to take admission in law courses through CLAT.

"Let the admissions (in law courses) be made on the basis of CLAT," the Bench said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for GGSIPU, submitted before the court that as per the High Court order, the varsity would have to conduct common entrance test for taking admissions in law courses as it cannot take admissions through CLAT.

The counsel appearing for self financing educational institutions association said students will have to suffer if admissions to law courses were made only through CLAT as the last date for applying for CLAT was already over.

However, to this, the Bench said that "Nobody will suffer. CLAT means CLAT.

Further, the Bench also said that "Your apprehension does not seem to be correct. Today, students are more smart. They must have applied for CLAT. Do not under estimate students.

On February 11, 2019, the Directorate of Higher Education of Delhi government had issued an order permitting the GGSIPU to adopt National Level Tests for admission to several courses, including LLB and LLM, for 2019-20.

Subsequently, a circular on February 26, 2019, was issued by the university saying it was likely to admit students in the law programs for the academic session 2019-20, through CLATUG and CLAT-PG.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email