38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Allahabad High Court Issues Criminal Contempt Notice to Lawyer Who Misbehaved with a Civil Judge [READ ORDER]

By M V Manasa      20 November, 2020 12:27 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad HC Criminal Contempt

On Wednesday (11 November 2020), Allahabad High Court issued a Criminal Contempt notice to a lawyer against whom, complaint dated 6.11.2020 was made by Varnika Shukla, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sadar, Pratapgarh. A bench of Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justice Saroj Yadav observed that Prima facie, the conduct of Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate amounts to committing criminal contempt.

It was alleged that the Advocate misbehaved with the Presiding Officer and used abusive language, created obstructions, and manhandled the Court as well as tore, snatched, and threw the order and ended up terrorizing and pressurizing the Court. It was further alleged that he did not let the Court to function, defamed the Court by making serious allegations of taking money and giving the judgment. The Advocate brought down the dignity of the Court in the public domain and weakened the authority of the Court.

As per the High Courts order, it was noted that the allegations made in the complaint dated 6.11.2020 are very serious in nature. The court issued a notice to Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate through Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh. The next hearing will be held on 7 December 2020. On this day, Advocate Vijay Kumar Pandey is ordered by the Court to remain personally present before the High Court. The Court also issued a notice to him, after going through the official report submitted by the Registry dated 9.11.2020. 

Earlier, a complaint regarding this misconduct by Advocate Vijay Kumar Pandey was also made by Varnika Shukla, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sadar, Pratapgarh. Therefore, this case was registered as Criminal Contempt and came before the Court under the orders of Chief Justice.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM

TOP STORIES

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email