38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 26, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Bar Council Of Maharashtra & Goa Warns Advocates Against Soliciting Work By Giving Advertisements In Newspapers And Whatsapp

By LawStreet News Network      23 September, 2019 11:01 PM      0 Comments
Bar Council Of Maharashtra & Goa Warns Advocates Against Soliciting Work By Giving Advertisements In Newspapers And Whatsapp

The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa through a letter dated September 21, 2019, has cautioned advocates against soliciting work by giving advertisements in newspapers and WhatsApp.

The letter, written by Advocate Pravin Ranpise, Secretary, Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa states, "As per Rule 36 Section IV Part VI of Chapter II of the Bar Council of India Rules framed under Section 49 of the Advocate's Act 1961, advertisement by an advocate is strictly prohibited.

The letter notes that the Punjab & Haryana Bar Council had earlier considered similar subject and passed allied directions. In view of the same, the letter states,

"In the event of notice of such type of advertisement made by advocates, immediate action shall be taken by the State Bar Council regarding misconduct.

Thus, all the advocates in the States of Maharashtra and Goa are prohibited from making any such advertisements."

Rule 36 Section IV part VI of Chapter II of the BCI rules states, An advocate shall not solicit work or advertise, either directly or indirectly, whether by circulars advertisements, touts, personal communications, interviews not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or producing his photographs to be published in connection with cases in which he has been engaged or concerned. His sign-board or name plate should be of a reasonable size. The sign-board or name plate or stationery should not indicate that he is or has been President or Member of a Bar Council or of any Association or that he has been associated with any person or organisation or with any particular cause or matter or that he specialises in any particular type or worker or that he has been a Judge or an Advocate General.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM

TOP STORIES

failure-to-generate-profits-from-movie-does-not-indicate-dishonest-intent-civil-dispute-cannot-be-given-the-colour-of-a-criminal-offence-sc
Trending Judiciary
Failure To Generate Profits From Movie Does Not Indicate Dishonest Intent; Civil Dispute Cannot Be Given the Colour of a Criminal Offence: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes Section 420 IPC case against film producer, says failure to share movie profits shows civil dispute, not cheating.

20 March, 2026 01:37 PM
gujarat-hc-upholds-cat-order-directs-centre-to-appoint-physically-handicapped-candidate-as-postal-sorting-assistant
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Upholds CAT Order, Directs Centre to Appoint Physically Handicapped Candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant [Read Judgment]

Gujarat HC upholds CAT order, directs Centre to appoint physically handicapped candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant, rejecting Union’s plea.

20 March, 2026 02:24 PM
orissa-hc-directs-son-to-vacate-ancestral-house-for-86-year-old-father-dismisses-cross-writ-petitions
Trending Judiciary
Orissa HC Directs Son to Vacate Ancestral House for 86-Year-Old Father; Dismisses Cross Writ Petitions [Read Judgment]

Orissa HC directs son to vacate ancestral house for 86-year-old father, dismissing both cross writ petitions under MWPSC Act, 2007.

20 March, 2026 02:28 PM
calling-journalists-shit-reporters-and-high-on-weed-goes-beyond-fair-criticism-delhi-hc-orders-news-laundry-to-remove-disparaging-remarks-against-aajtak
Trending Judiciary
Calling Journalists ‘Shit Reporters’ and ‘High on Weed’ Goes Beyond Fair Criticism: Delhi High Court Orders News Laundry to Remove Disparaging Remarks Against AajTak [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders News Laundry to remove remarks against AajTak, holding terms like “shit reporters” went beyond fair criticism.

20 March, 2026 03:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email