38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

BCI constitutes a seven-member committee to draft an Advocates' Protection Bill to Ensure Protection to Lawyers from Threats, Attacks [READ RESOLUTION]

By Nancy Goyal      15 June, 2021 07:42 PM      0 Comments
BCI constitutes a seven-member committee to draft an Advocates' Protection Bill to Ensure Protection to Lawyers from Threats, Attacks [READ RESOLUTION]

Taking note of increasing incidents of attacks on Advocates, the BCI (Bar Council of India) has decided to constitute a 7 Member Committee for framing a draft of "Advocates Protection Bill to ensure adequate protection to members of the legal fraternity so that they can carry on their duties as officers of the court, fearlessly without having to worry about their and their family's safety.

The BCI stated that,

"Such Act must be passed by the Parliament at the earliest as the Advocates fraternity is acting as one of the essential wings of the justice delivery system akin to the Police and the Judiciary and while the police and judiciary have access to protection and privileges, but, the most important link between the two who argue and present the cases/matters in courts is/are not given proper protection against the nefarious activity of anti-social elements."

The Council has nominated the following members to be part of the Committee:

  • Mr. S. Prabakaran, Sr. Advocate, Vice-Chairman, Bar Council of India;
  • Mr. Debi Prasad Dhal, Sr. Advocate, Executive Chairman, Bar Council of India Trust;
  • Mr. Suresh Chandra Shrimali, Co-Chairman, Bar Council of India;
  • Mr. Shailendra Dubey, Member, Bar Council of India;
  • Mr. A. Rami Reddy, Executive Vice-Chairman, Bar Council of India Trust;
  • Mr. Shreenath Tripathi, Member, Bar Council of India; and
  • Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Member, Bar Council of India.

The General Council of the Bar Council of India, in its meeting held on 10.06.2021 has discussed the frequent and often violent physical attacks on members of the Advocates fraternity in several parts of the country and has decided to constitute a 7 Member Committee to draft the Advocates Protection Bill.

The council discussed an incident where a Jaipur lawyer, namely Advocate Shri Ram Sharma, and his wife were attacked physically, causing them several injuries.

The council further discussed the heinous and barbaric incident of daylight murder of Advocate Couple (Gattu Vaman Rao and his wife P. V. Nagamani) in Telangana.

The Council has also mentioned that the Karnataka Advocate had filed a PIL against custodial death in the police station and some other cases against some leaders of the ruling party in Telangana and the horrific incident took us back to the days of anarchy and lawlessness and goonda raj.

Taking note of severe threat and attack on the Independence of the Bar, the bar council of India stated that,

It was discussed and deliberated with anguish that it is extremely distressing to see that while it is the Advocates fraternity that provides justice to the citizens of the country; and for this reason, they have to file and argue cases most of the time against the dreaded anti-social elements and criminals, but the Advocates are themselves left without even bare minimum adequate protection against such elements. As a result of such cases, Advocates are often at the receiving end/target of such criminal and anti-social elements.

The council also stated it is high time when State and Centre government should take up the issues with all sincerity "failing which the Advocates of the country would have to take recourse of a countrywide agitation."

 

[READ RESOLUTION]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email