38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

BCI directs State Bar Councils, online portals to remove ads of lawyers, following Madras HC ruling [Read Press Release]

By Jhanak Sharma      08 July, 2024 06:47 PM      0 Comments
BCI directs State Bar Councils online portals to remove ads of lawyers following Madras HC ruling

New Delhi: The Bar Council of India (BCI) has directed state bar councils and various online platforms to remove online advertisements by lawyers soliciting work.

This directive follows a recent Madras High Court judgment instructing the BCI to establish guidelines urging state bar councils to take disciplinary action against advocates who advertise or solicit work through ads, messages, or intermediaries. The judgment, dated July 3, emphasized that the legal profession is a noble service and not a profit-driven business. The Court noted that marketing legal services or introducing branding into the legal profession undermines its nobility and integrity, which is harmful to society.

In accordance with the Madras High Courts directions, the BCI has issued two communications: one to state bar councils and another to major online service providers including Quikr, Sulekha, Just Dial, and Grotal. State bar councils have been instructed to take strict disciplinary action against advocates who advertise or seek work through online portals, violating the Bar Council of India Rules. Cease and desist notices have been sent to online service providers, addressing the illegal advertising and solicitation of legal services on their platforms.

The BCI has warned that non-compliance with its directives will lead to legal proceedings and penalties against the offending organizations. All portals, online platforms, and advocates found violating Rule-36 of the Bar Council of India Rules are hereby issued a public notice to ensure strict compliance with these Rules immediately. Any advertisements contravening the aforementioned Rule must be withdrawn forthwith, stated the BCI press release issued on Monday.

The key directives issued to State Bar Councils include:

1. Initiating disciplinary actions against advocates advertising or seeking work through online portals.

2. Filing complaints against online service providers facilitating illegal advertisements by lawyers.

3. Ensuring the removal of all illegal advertisements related to legal services on online platforms within four weeks.

4. A compliance hearing is scheduled for August 20, 2024. State bar councils must submit a report on actions taken by August 10, 2024.

The directives issued to online platforms are:

1. Removing all listings, profiles, and advertisements related to legal practices by advocates immediately and no later than four weeks from the date of the notice.

2. Ceasing any operations that enable the advertisement or solicitation of legal practice by advocates.

3. Submitting a detailed compliance report outlining the actions taken to the BCI by August 10, 2024.

Recently Madras High Court directed BCI to issue Circulars/Instructions/Guidelines to the State Bar Councils to initiate disciplinary proceedings for misconduct against the Advocates advertising, soliciting works directly or indirectly, whether by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communication, interviews not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or producing his photographs to be published in connection with the case where he is engaged or concerned.

 

[Read Press Release]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Supreme Court upholds order to bar Advocate from practice for running taxi service [Read Order] Supreme Court upholds order to bar Advocate from practice for running taxi service [Read Order]

The Supreme Court upholds the decision to bar an advocate from practicing law for one year due to misconduct related to running a taxi service. The court found serious allegations against the appellant and confirmed the disciplinary committee's decision.

Bipartisan effort in passage of women's reservation bill in Parliament: CJI Bipartisan effort in passage of women's reservation bill in Parliament: CJI

Discover the commendable bipartisan effort behind the passage of the women's reservation bill in Parliament, as highlighted by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud. Explore the significance of institutional collaboration in achieving justice and the parallels with the drafting of the Indian Constitution. Learn how diverse backgrounds and conflicting ideologies came together for a common cause.

Prime Minister Modi Advocates Simple Legal Language and Accessible Laws To Make Common Man Understand It Prime Minister Modi Advocates Simple Legal Language and Accessible Laws To Make Common Man Understand It

In his address at the International Lawyers Conference 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi underscores the importance of simplifying legal language and processes for common citizens. He discusses efforts to make laws more accessible and highlights the role of technology in streamlining legal procedures.

"Stop calling me 'My Lord' in return for half of my salary": Supreme Court judge shuns colonial-era practice "Stop calling me 'My Lord' in return for half of my salary": Supreme Court judge shuns colonial-era practice

While in 2006, the Bar Council of India had passed a resolution that no advocate would address judges as "My Lords" and "Your Lordships", it failed to be followed in practice. A Supreme Court judge's recent reaction to being called 'My Lord' brought up the matter again.

TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email