38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Bombay High Court decides to allow use of A4 size paper for filing pleadings

By Prachi Jain      15 July, 2021 05:30 PM      0 Comments
Bombay High Court decides to allow

A notification to that effect had been issued amending the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 and Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 so as to implement the use of A4 paper printed on both sides.

The Bombay High Court has decided to allow use of A4 size paper printed on both sides for filing of pleadings in the High Court (Ajinkya Mohan Udane v. Registrar General, Bombay High Court).

A Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni was informed by advocate SR Nargolkar appearing for the High Court administration that a notification to that effect had been issued amending the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 and Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 so as to implement the use of A4 paper printed on both sides.

He submitted that the notification had also been issued in the gazette on July 6, 2021. In view of this notification, the petition stood redressed, he submitted.

Advocate PR Katneshwarkar appearing for the petitioner, Mumbai lawyer Ajinkya Udane, enquired if the notification was applicable to subordinate courts in Maharashtra.

Nargolkar informed that the notification was applicable only to the High Courts (which includes all of the benches) as of now.

The Bench directed Katneshwarkar to make a representation to the Registrar General of the High Court to issue appropriate directions to the subordinate courts in Maharashtra to permit use of A4 size papers in lower courts.

A similar plea was filed earlier in October 20, 2020, with identical prayers by Advocate Sujay Joshi. While appreciating that the plea filed, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the administrative side.

Consequently, Joshi had withdrawn the plea and filed a representation before the Registrar General. Interestingly, the petitioner in this case, advocates Udane along with advocate Ranjit Shinde had appeared for Joshi in that case and had made a representation to the Registrar on December 12, 2020 as per the Court's directions.

Since they did not receive any response to the representation, Udane approached the High Court with the present plea.

Udane submitted in the present plea that use of A4 size paper will help save huge amount of paper and storage space and will, therefore, save large number of trees thus aiding in protection of environment and wildlife.

Udane argued that notifications and directions had issued by different High Courts in the country which allowed filings in A4 size paper printed on both sides. The case of Himachal Pradesh, Tripura, Kerala, Karnataka, Kolkata and Allahabad High Courts were highlighted in this regard.

The notification issued by Mahendra Chandwani, Registrar General of High Court amending the High Court Rules provides use of "superior quality A4 size paper not having less than 75 GSM with printing on both sides" instead of "foolscap size paper"

After this notification, a circular was issued on Wednesday to all benches of the High Court which is the Principal Bench, Nagpur Bench, Aurangabad Bench and High Court at Goa, to use A4 size paper for internal communication at all levels in the Registry.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email