38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 05, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Chandigarh HC Seeks BCI, State Bar Council Reply Over PIL Filed Against Exorbitant Enrollment Fee

By RITIK JAIN      17 August, 2020 05:56 PM      0 Comments
Chandigarh HC Seeks BCI, State Bar Council Reply Over PIL Filed Against Exorbitant Enrollment Fee

An Advocate has filed a PIL against very high fees worth Rs 16,400 charged from the new advocates to enroll them. The respondents will be replying to this, on November 5. The bench of this case was a Division Bench, which consisted of Justice Ravi Shankar Jha and Justice Arun Palli, who had issued a notification to Punjab and Haryana Bar Council and Bar Council of India regarding the same. 

Advocates Act, 1961, is the primary legislation governing legal practitioners in India. It includes governing aspects pertaining to the constitution of Bar Councils, admission and enrolment of advocates, their rights to practice and their conduct, divulged by the petitioners counsel Mr. Padhuman Garg. 

He further added that under Section 24 (1) (f) of the Advocates Act, 1961, a person has to pay Rs 600 to the state bar council and Rs 150 to the Bar Council of India if the person wants themselves to enroll as an Advocate. In case, the applicant belongs to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe category, the enrollment fee payable to the State Bar Council is Rs 100 and Rs 25 to the Bar Council of India. 

In contrast to the Legislative Mandate, the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana used to charge unnecessarily high enrollment fees. State Bar Council used to charge an additional fee of Rs 8,600 as enrolment fee, Rs 1050 to Bar Council of India, Rs 1,000 as the building fund, and Rs 5,000 towards welfare and insurance fund. And, if in case, an applicant wants to get them enrolled the same day, the State Bar Council used to charge an additional amount worth Rs 5,000 toward the circulation fee, Mr. Padhuman Garg added. 

The petitioner argued, that in addition to the interdiction as prescribed by the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, even the Bar Council of India rules does not give the permission to the State Bar Councils to levy such an additional fee towards enrolment and additional fee. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

prior-notice-mandatory-before-property-demolition-section-405-power-not-absolute-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Prior Notice Mandatory Before Property Demolition, Section 405 Power Not Absolute: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules demolition without notice illegal; Section 405 is enabling, not absolute, and must follow natural justice.

04 May, 2026 04:11 PM
sc-dismisses-tmc-plea-on-exclusion-of-state-officials-as-counting-supervisors-records-eci-assurance
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses TMC Plea on Exclusion of State Officials as Counting Supervisors, Records ECI Assurance

Supreme Court declines TMC plea on counting supervisors, records ECI assurance to follow its circular in West Bengal Assembly elections.

04 May, 2026 05:07 PM

TOP STORIES

private-neighbourhood-schools-cannot-refuse-admission-to-students-allotted-by-state-under-rte-act-on-ground-of-eligibility-dispute-sc
Trending Judiciary
Private Neighbourhood Schools Cannot Refuse Admission to Students Allotted by State Under RTE Act on Ground of Eligibility Dispute: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules private schools must admit RTE-allotted students without delay; eligibility disputes cannot be grounds to deny admission under Article 21A.

29 April, 2026 11:55 AM
meghalaya-murder-case-shillong-court-grants-bail-to-accused-wife-over-failure-to-communicate-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya Murder Case: Shillong Court Grants Bail to Accused Wife Over Failure to Communicate Grounds of Arrest

Shillong court grants bail to Sonam Raghuvanshi in Meghalaya murder case, citing failure to communicate arrest grounds and violation of Article 22(1).

29 April, 2026 12:55 PM
court-sentences-bjp-mla-nitesh-rane-to-one-months-imprisonment-for-humiliating-engineer-by-making-him-walk-through-muddy-water-in-public
Trending Judiciary
Court Sentences BJP MLA Nitesh Rane to One Month’s Imprisonment for Humiliating Engineer by Making Him Walk Through Muddy Water in Public [Read Judgment]

Sindhudurg court sentences Nitesh Rane to 1 month jail under IPC Sec 504 for forcing engineer to walk through muddy water; others acquitted.

29 April, 2026 01:53 PM
bombay-hc-adjourns-9-year-defamation-suit-to-2046-calls-it-an-ego-fight-between-senior-citizens
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Adjourns 9-Year Defamation Suit to 2046, Calls It an “Ego Fight” Between Senior Citizens [Read Order]

Bombay High Court adjourns 9-year defamation suit to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between senior citizens and declining priority hearing.

29 April, 2026 02:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email