38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 12, 2024
Legal Insiders

Chandigarh HC Seeks BCI, State Bar Council Reply Over PIL Filed Against Exorbitant Enrollment Fee

By RITIK JAIN      17 August, 2020 05:56 PM      0 Comments
Chandigarh HC Seeks BCI, State Bar Council Reply Over PIL Filed Against Exorbitant Enrollment Fee

An Advocate has filed a PIL against very high fees worth Rs 16,400 charged from the new advocates to enroll them. The respondents will be replying to this, on November 5. The bench of this case was a Division Bench, which consisted of Justice Ravi Shankar Jha and Justice Arun Palli, who had issued a notification to Punjab and Haryana Bar Council and Bar Council of India regarding the same. 

“Advocates Act, 1961, is the primary legislation governing legal practitioners in India. It includes governing aspects pertaining to the constitution of Bar Councils, admission and enrolment of advocates, their rights to practice and their conduct,” divulged by the petitioner’s counsel Mr. Padhuman Garg. 

He further added that under Section 24 (1) (f) of the Advocates Act, 1961, a person has to pay Rs 600 to the state bar council and Rs 150 to the Bar Council of India if the person wants themselves to enroll as an Advocate. In case, the applicant belongs to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe category, the enrollment fee payable to the State Bar Council is Rs 100 and Rs 25 to the Bar Council of India. 

In contrast to the Legislative Mandate, the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana used to charge unnecessarily high enrollment fees. State Bar Council used to charge an additional fee of Rs 8,600 as enrolment fee, Rs 1050 to Bar Council of India, Rs 1,000 as the building fund, and Rs 5,000 towards welfare and insurance fund. And, if in case, an applicant wants to get them enrolled the same day, the State Bar Council used to charge an additional amount worth Rs 5,000 toward the circulation fee, Mr. Padhuman Garg added. 

The petitioner argued, that “in addition to the interdiction as prescribed by the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, even the Bar Council of India rules does not give the permission to the State Bar Councils to levy such an additional fee towards enrolment and additional fee.” 

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Repatriate Mortal Remains of Sufi Saint from Dhaka

Supreme Court declines plea to repatriate mortal remains of Sufi Saint, an Indian-born Pakistani national who died in Dhaka.

06 April, 2024 01:40 PM
Trending Judiciary
'28 % GST on online gaming companies,' SC transfers to itself all pleas pending in 9 HCs

Supreme Court consolidates 27 petitions challenging the 28% GST on online gaming companies from 9 High Courts, amid legal disputes over tax rates.

06 April, 2024 01:45 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to Prof Shoma Sen in Bhima Koregaon case [Read Judgment]

SC grants bail to Prof Shoma Sen in Bhima Koregaon case, citing lack of evidence linking her to banned terrorist group CPI (Maoist). Details inside.

06 April, 2024 01:58 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC directs TN DGP to hold inquiry for blatant, shocking acts by police in tutoring witnesses [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court directs Tamil Nadu DGP to investigate police misconduct in witness tampering, leading to acquittal in murder case.

06 April, 2024 05:31 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email