38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Collegium Recommends Chief Justices of Delhi, Rajasthan, and Gauhati High Courts for Elevation to Supreme Court [Read Order]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      07 November, 2023 04:48 PM      0 Comments
Collegium Recommends Chief Justices of Delhi Rajasthan and Gauhati High Courts for Elevation to Supreme Court Read Order

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Collegium has on November 6 recommended for elevation of Delhi, Rajasthan and Gauhati High Courts Chief Justices as judges of the top court, by observing that it is necessary to have full strength in view of ever mounting cases.

In its meeting, the Collegium headed by Chief Justice of India and comprising four senior most judges approved for appointment of Delhi HC CJ Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Rajasthan HC CJ Justice Augustine George Masih and Gauhati HC CJ Justice Sandeep Mehta as judges of the top court.

With sanctioned strength of 34 judges, the SC is at present working with 31 judges.

"The Supreme Court has a huge backlog of cases. In view of the ever mounting pendency of cases, the workload of judges has increased considerably. It has become necessary to ensure that the Court has full working judge-strength leaving no vacancy at any point of time," the Collegium said.

In selection of three names, the Collegium considered the seniority of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges in their respective parent High Courts as well as overall seniority of the High Court Judges; the merit, performance and integrity of the judges under consideration; and the need to ensure diversity, among others.

"After carefully evaluating the merit, integrity and competence of eligible Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of the High Courts and also accommodating a plurality of considerations, the Collegium found the three persons to be deserving and suitable in all respects for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India," the Collegium said.

Of the three, Justice Sharma stood at serial number two in the combined all India seniority of High Court Judges. He was appointed as a judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on January 18, 2008. He was elevated as Chief Justice of the High Court for the State of Telangana on October 11, 2021 and thereafter transferred to High Court of Delhi on June 28, 2022.

Sharma has served as a judge of the High Court for more than 15 years and as Chief Justice of High 
Court for more than two years. The judgments authored by him dealing with issues in various branches of law stand testimony to his legal acumen and competence. Before his elevation as a Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, he practised in constitutional, service, civil and criminal matters, it said.

Justice Masih, who belongs to minority community, stands at serial number seven in the combined all India seniority of High Court Judges. He was appointed as a Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on July 10, 2008 and elevated as Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court on May 30, 2023. During his long tenure as a judge of the High Court, Justice Masih has acquired significant experience in diverse fields of law. Before his elevation, he practised in Constitutional, service, labour, and civil matters.

Justice Mehta stood at serial number 23 in the combined all India seniority of High Court Judges. He was appointed as a judge of the Rajasthan High Court on May 30, 2011. Having attained seniority in his parent High Court, he was elevated as Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court and is serving there since February 15, 2023.

The Rajasthan High Court which is Justice Mehta's parent High Court is a large High Court which does not have representation on the bench of the Supreme Court.Justice Mehta has served as a judge of the High Court for more than 12 years. During his long tenure as a judge of the Rajasthan High Court and as Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, Justice Mehta has acquired significant adjudicatory experience. Before his elevation, he practised before trial courts, High Court and the Supreme Court, mainly in constitutional and criminal laws, the Collegium said. 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-rejects-plea-upholds-3500-aibe-exam-fee-by-bci-as-not-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

SC dismisses plea against Rs 3,500 AIBE fee, upholding Bar Council of India’s right to charge for exam expenses, ruling fee not unconstitutional.

03 September, 2025 11:16 AM
hc-dismisses-plea-for-bail-by-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-case-of-conspiracy-to-delhi-riots
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses plea for bail by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in case of conspiracy to Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC dismisses bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 riots conspiracy case, citing strong evidence and grave role in instigating violence.

03 September, 2025 12:20 PM
elgar-parishad-case-sc-defers-bail-plea-of-accused-lawyer-surendra-gadling-to-sep-17
Trending Judiciary
Elgar Parishad Case: SC Defers Bail Plea of Accused Lawyer Surendra Gadling to Sep 17

SC defers Surendra Gadling’s bail plea in Elgar Parishad case to Sep 17; advocate jailed over 6 years under UAPA charges without trial.

03 September, 2025 06:31 PM
unacceptable-sc-says-everyone-cant-come-to-it-just-due-to-physical-proximity
Trending Judiciary
'Unacceptable,' SC says everyone can't come to it just due to physical proximity

SC: Not acceptable to approach top court just due to proximity; raps Sukesh Chandrashekar’s wife Leena Paulose over bail plea hearing.

03 September, 2025 08:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email