38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Law Minister confirms Court Proceedings via Video Conferencing to continue for some time

By Priyam Jain      11 May, 2020 05:13 PM      0 Comments
Court Proceedings via Video Conferencing

The Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Sunday (May 10th, 2020) declared that court proceedings through video conferencing may remain a norm for some time to come in view of the COVID-19 pandemic. Around 1,282 advocates had registered for e-filling of petitions during the lockdown, in response to which the Law Minister confirmed the said move.

In a first of its kind virtual meeting headed by Attorney General KK Venugopal, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and the Law Ministry Officials, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and some law officers laid importance and emphasis on the need to accept and take this challenge as an opportunity to make digital systems in justice delivery more robust and practical. 

The meeting was also attended by all Additional Solicitors General and Assistant Solicitors General, Secretary of Department of Legal Affairs and Secretary of Department of Justice. It was contended and stated that In view of the seriousness of the pandemic, court proceedings through video conferencing may remain a norm for some time to come.

A statement released by the Law Ministry read as The Attorney General and many other law officers laid emphasis on the need to strengthen the e-courts system by addressing the connectivity issues and by training lawyers in e-courts management. The Law Minister further asked the justice secretary to bring these challenges before the committee and come in coordination with the National Informatics Centre and to improve the system.

The release also stated that As many as 1,282 advocates have registered for e-filling of petitions during the lockdown, of which 543 advocates have registered in the last week alone. The Law Minister further citing a flurry of PILs in various courts during this lockdown held that in these challenging times overzealous PILs need to be avoided and Though one cannot stop anyone from filing cases, there must be an effective response to these types of intervention. The Supreme Court had also flagged a similar concern that the concept of PIL has been forgotten. 

The Law Ministry further emphasized that addressing such a serious pandemic that throws up complicated and sensitive nature of challenges, which the governance system has responded to and that it would be appropriate that this decision-making process of the Centre and State governments needs to be trusted. 

 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email