38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi Bar Council Objects To Inclusion Of Lawyers Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Read Letter]

By LawStreet News Network      12 March, 2020 10:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Bar Council Objects To Inclusion Of Lawyers Under the Consumer Protection Act

On March 08, 2020, a letter was written by the Bar Council of Delhi to the Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan expressing dissent towards the contemplation of the Ministry to include lawyers within the definition of Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (Act).

The legal profession is an integral part of justice delivery system and is not a commercial or trade activity and the legal profession cannot be included for any purpose under the Consumer Protection Act 2019 or the rules as being contemplated stated the letter penned down by the Bar Council of Delhi.

The co-chairman of Delhi Bar Council, Sanjay Rathi stated that "This all started with the case Indian Medical Association v. VP Shanta, where the court declared the medical practitioners were subject to the rules and mechanisms of CPA which rose the question, if doctors can be made liable under the CPA, why not lawyers?

Further, he added that "A Lawyer, unlike other professionals, is placed in a very peculiar position while rendering legal services. An architect or a doctor is pure client servicing while on the other hand, it is not possible to term the job profile of a lawyer as client servicing because lawyers are nothing but the officers of the Honble Court who have to assist the court and not to act as a mouthpiece of the client. The lawyer renders his assistance to his client and nothing more, whereas the doctor-patient relationship is one to one. This places an onerous obligation on the lawyers; on the one hand, he has to represent his client to the best of his abilities, and on the other, he has to maintain a far greater degree of detachment than another profession".

Further, Sanjay Rathi added that the lawyers across the country will never accept their inclusion within the Part of Definition in the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. 

Moreover, the profession of lawyers is an integral part of the judicial system and isnt available in relation for trade-in commercial actions and the legal profession cannot be inserted for any purpose under the provision of Consumer Protection Act 2019 of the Rules as being contemplated. 

The objection which has been raised by the Chairman of Delhi Bar Council is to not insert the word lawyer within the definition of Services under the said Act or Rules.

The Ministry of Consumer Protection and ally in National Democratic Alliance (NDA), Ram Vilas Paswan stated that the Government would set up an authority to implement the Consumer Protection Act in April this year. 

[Read Letter]

Author: Asif Iqbal 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email