38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi High Court Notifies New Roster For Judges [Read Roster]

By LawStreet News Network      21 August, 2019 11:08 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Notifies New Roster For Judges [Read Roster]

The Delhi High Court on August 20, 2019, notified a new roster for the allocation of cases to judges, which will come into effect from August 23, 2019.

As per the new roster, the Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice D.N. Patel will hear all public interest litigation petitions other than those pending before the Division Bench comprising of Justice G.S. Sistani and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani.

The Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice will also deal with the following matters:-

  1. Writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of any Act, Statutory Rule, Regulation or Notification other than tax and Service matters.
  2. Writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of any Act, Statutory Rule, Regulation or Notification impacting Criminal Investigation, Trial, Prosecutions etc.
  3. Writ Petitions invoking constitutional provisions and Writ Petitions other than the specified categories.
  4. Letters Patent Appeals of the year 2019 other than service.
  5. Service Tax Cases, Central Excise Act cases, Custom Act cases and VAT Appeals.
  6. Writ Petitions pertaining to Service Tax, Central Excise Act, Custom Act and Value Added Tax (VAT) cases.
  7. Matters to be heard by Commercial Appellate Division.
  8. Regular hearing matters of the above categories.

The roster specifies that all the urgent matters will be mentioned before the Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice. Moreover, all the fresh PILs shall be listed before the Bench presided over by the Chief Justice.

Most importantly, the roster notifies that the cases of the convicts/appellants in jail, whose sentence is about to be completed or have completed the substantial period of the maximum sentence of the offence charged against them, shall be taken up on priority basis and every endeavor should be made to dispose of the same expeditiously.

[Read Roster]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email