38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi High Court Issues Order Regarding Posting/ Transfer of Members of Delhi Judicial Service

By Parul Singhal      21 November, 2020 01:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Judicial Service HC

The Delhi High Court on 18th November, 2020, issued an order to make postings/ transfers of 215 Judicial Officers in the Delhi Judicial Services. 

As per the order, the postings/ transfers will come into immediate effect. 

The judicial officers that are mentioned in the list will be under the control of the District & Sessions Judge of the District to which they have been allocated. 

Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, Manoj Jain, issued an order listing out the names of 168 judges who were transferred, and another 47 judicial officers who were inducted to be metropolitan magistrates. 

According to a Hindustan Times report, the latest shuffle comes close on the heels of the November 13 order where the High Court had listed 16 promotions to the post of Delhi higher judicial services. 

Among the promotions, the most prominent one is of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Purshottam Pathak who was hearing cases pertaining to the northeast Delhi riots, and Chief Metropolitan magistrate Gurmohina Kaur who was hearing cases related to the foreign nationals who had participated in the Tablighi Jamaat congregration at Niamuddin Markaz in March. 

The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vishal Pahuja who has been hearing former union minister MJ Akbars case against Journalist Priya Ramani has also been transferred to another court by the Delhi High Court. 

Although the transfer of judges is a routine affair, it is likely to delay the disposal of cases, as the judges who will replace their colleagues may have to hear the arguments from various sides again. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email