38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Delhi High Court Issues Order Regarding Posting/ Transfer of Members of Delhi Judicial Service

By Parul Singhal      21 November, 2020 01:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Judicial Service HC

The Delhi High Court on 18th November, 2020, issued an order to make postings/ transfers of 215 Judicial Officers in the Delhi Judicial Services. 

As per the order, the postings/ transfers will come into immediate effect. 

The judicial officers that are mentioned in the list will be under the control of the District & Sessions Judge of the District to which they have been allocated. 

Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, Manoj Jain, issued an order listing out the names of 168 judges who were transferred, and another 47 judicial officers who were inducted to be metropolitan magistrates. 

According to a Hindustan Times report, the latest shuffle comes close on the heels of the November 13 order where the High Court had listed 16 promotions to the post of Delhi higher judicial services. 

Among the promotions, the most prominent one is of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Purshottam Pathak who was hearing cases pertaining to the northeast Delhi riots, and Chief Metropolitan magistrate Gurmohina Kaur who was hearing cases related to the foreign nationals who had participated in the Tablighi Jamaat congregration at Niamuddin Markaz in March. 

The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vishal Pahuja who has been hearing former union minister MJ Akbars case against Journalist Priya Ramani has also been transferred to another court by the Delhi High Court. 

Although the transfer of judges is a routine affair, it is likely to delay the disposal of cases, as the judges who will replace their colleagues may have to hear the arguments from various sides again. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cannot-penalise-lawyers-for-attending-court-despite-boycott-calls-tripura-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Penalise Lawyers For Attending Court Despite Boycott Calls: Tripura HC [Read Order]

Tripura High Court held that Bar Associations cannot penalise advocates for appearing in court despite boycott calls by lawyers’ bodies.

18 May, 2026 03:57 PM
tcs-posh-panel-member-denied-bail-in-nashik-harassment-case
Trending Business
TCS POSH Panel Member Denied Bail in Nashik Harassment Case [Read Order]

Nashik court denied bail to a TCS POSH panel member in a workplace harassment case, citing alleged inaction on repeated complaints.

18 May, 2026 04:10 PM

TOP STORIES

punjab-and-haryana-hc-lifts-ban-on-zee5-documentary-on-lawrence-bishnoi-sets-aside-centres-advisory
Trending CelebStreet
Punjab and Haryana HC Lifts Ban on ZEE5 Documentary on Lawrence Bishnoi, Sets Aside Centre’s Advisory [Read Order]

Punjab and Haryana High Court lifts ban on ZEE5’s Lawrence Bishnoi documentary, quashes Centre’s advisory over lack of legal basis.

13 May, 2026 03:33 PM
deliberate-institutional-blindness-jharkhand-high-court-slams-illegal-mining-in-hazaribagh-issues-15-sweeping-directions
Trending Judiciary
“Deliberate Institutional Blindness”: Jharkhand High Court Slams Illegal Mining in Hazaribagh, Issues 15 Sweeping Directions [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court issues 15 directions on illegal mining in Hazaribagh, holding continued inaction despite surveillance violates Article 21.

13 May, 2026 04:17 PM
sc-quashes-35-year-old-criminal-case-flags-crisis-of-undertrial-delay-in-uttar-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes 35-Year-Old Criminal Case, Flags Crisis of Undertrial Delay in Uttar Pradesh [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes a 35-year-old criminal case, calls undertrial delays a violation of Article 21, and seeks data on UP’s justice backlog.

13 May, 2026 04:28 PM
wifes-pursuit-of-professional-career-cannot-be-branded-as-matrimonial-cruelty-or-desertion-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Pursuit of Professional Career Cannot Be Branded as Matrimonial Cruelty or Desertion: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court held that a wife pursuing her career cannot be termed cruel or accused of desertion, calling such views patriarchal and regressive.

13 May, 2026 05:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email