38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 19, 2024
Legal Insiders

DHCBA To Chief Justice of Delhi HC: "Mental & Economic Strain Makes Resumption of Physical Court Hearings Imperative”

By Ghazal Bhootra      23 July, 2020 04:53 PM      0 Comments
DHCBA To Chief Justice of Delhi HC:

The Delhi High Court Bar Association recently addressed a letter regarding the resumption of physical court hearings to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi.

The letter bears the sign of Advocate Abhijat Bal, Secretary of DHCBA and contends that since "virtually all sectors have gradually opened including the private and government officers, market places and even shopping malls, etc." with social distancing norms, there is "an urgent and pressing need to resume physical hearings in the High Court of Delhi which have been suspended for nearly 720 days now". 

Mentioning the gigantic mental and economic burden that lawyers are facing due to the physical courts not being in order and hearings only conducted through Video Conferencing Platforms of urgent matters, the written statement suggests that the suspension of physical hearings cannot be the course of action at the cost of livelihood of many lawyers. 

"The grim psychological and economic impact of the suspension of physical Courts has to be considered and every possible attempt to restore normalcy needs to be made. The same is in keeping with the police of the Central and State Government which have by the issuance of the unlock guidelines, provided for a gradual return to normalcy in all sector and courts cannot continue to be the exception at the cost of the livelihood for a vast majority of lawyers" 

With regard to this, the Bar Association suggests a "hybrid system" which follows the un-lockdown guidelines. 

Furthermore, the letter argues that allowing Court proceedings and the judicial system only through video conferencing brings its’ "inherent limitations" that has led to a high number of pending cases, as well as many subjudice matters, have been in a state of suspension for the period of 4 months now due to the pandemic, "thereby retarding the efficiency of the justice dispensation system". 

The letter also mentions that the Rule of Law which is brought about through open-court hearings, which is not possible through the virtual system, which disturbs “this delicate equilibrium on which our Constitution was drafted”. 

The letter addresses the point of lack of facilities, for example; technological advancement for lawyers and high-speed internet connectivity, DHCBA argued that virtual hearings not only make hearings futile but also don’t do enough justice to "the art of advocacy". Other factors stated are inclusive of lack of coordination between briefing and arguing counsel and the wastage of precious judicial time and the importance of conducting trials, which has many obstacles through virtual mode. 

"Another factor which makes resumption of physical courts imperative is conducting of trials. Several jurists have gone on record to say that holding of trials through video conferencing would have several pitfalls and could be a tool for misuse in the hands of unscrupulous litigants. The whole purpose of cross-examination would be defeated... " 

Hence, arguing for resumption in a phased manner, the DHCBA has mentioned suggestions (although not exhaustive) that the Chief Justice may ponder upon:

  1. Resumption may resume initially with a limited number of benches first;
  2. Adoption of fixed timeslot for a few matters that may well be listed for physical hearings and restrictions on entry into lobby/waiting areas of Court premises;
  3. To start with limited fresh non-urgent matters per court listed each day;
  4. Adoption of SOPs with regards to Social Distancing norms to be followed in courts which may be widely circulated through the website.

The DHCBA also mentions in the letter that it "assures its co-operation in circulating the same through email and SMS as also on the social media". 

The letter also has an Annexure which talks of more standards of procedures that are inclusive of “restrictions of entry to Court buildings only for advocates and their Clerks having their cases listed on that particular day/slot, thermal scanners deployment, social distance markings, regular sanitization of court premises, closure of Canteen and main cafeteria initially as well as substantially reducing seating capacity.”



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
we-all-know-what-happened-when-there-were-ballot-papers-sc-on-return-of-ballot-papers-or-100-vvpats-count
Trending Judiciary
'We all know what happened when there were ballot papers,' SC on return of ballot papers or 100% VVPATs count

SC questions EVM process, debates ballot paper return and 100% VVPAT count verification, citing past issues.

18 April, 2024 01:53 PM

TOP STORIES

lsj-exclusive-interview-how-bjp-govt-will-free-chhattisgarh-from-naxal-menace
Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
sc-rejects-review-of-order-to-pay-rs-154-cr-compensation-to-ex-air-force-staff-for-transfusion-of-hiv-infected-blood
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
cji-cautions-against-overlooking-ethical-legal-consideration-on-use-of-ai-in-court-adjudication
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM
need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email