38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

HC judges to pay surprise visits to Aurangabad quarantine centers Bombay HC

By Shreedhara Purohit      09 July, 2020 02:07 PM      0 Comments
HC judges to pay surprise visits to Aurangabad quarantine centers Bombay HC

Expressing dissatisfaction over lack of coordination between authorities and concerned over the alarming situation in the district, Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court, in a significant order said it may visit COVID-19 quarantine facilities and hospitals to see whether discipline was being maintained. It further said the bench may give directions to register a case against those not discharging their duties regardless of their ranks.

The court said that if they found public servants shirking their responsibilities, they would issue directions for registering criminal complaints against such officials. They would also seek details of negligent officials from the Aurangabad civic administration.

A division bench of Justices Tanaji V Nalawade and Shrikant D Kulkarni made the observations on July 3 while hearing, through videoconference, a suomotu public interest litigation indicating concerns over administrative decisions to contain COVID-19 in Aurangabad region. The court had also referred to reports related to COVID-19 deaths at the civil hospital in Jalgaon among others.

Earlier, on June 26, the High Court took suomotu cognizance of news reports related to a spike in Covid-19 cases in Aurangabad and filed the plea through its registry and appointed senior advocate Rajendra S Deshmukh as Amicus Curiae to assist the bench with the PIL. The court had observed a lack of coordination and non-cooperation among various authorities of the Aurangabad region and had said that all of them, including the police machinery, need to work together. The bench had said that while most of the health staff at public health centers are working with devotion and have sacrificed lives of their families, a few public servants are not working diligently.

On July 3, public prosecutor D R Kale told the court that action was being taken against public servants and submitted a compilation of details as sought by the court. Rajendra S Deshmukh, also submitted that there was still no discipline among public servants and many in the COVID-19 control program were absent on duty.

 Noting that such unfortunate incidents were happening despite its directions, the court said that such persons were required to be suspended immediately and criminal action needed to be taken against them. It can be said that in our country, only poor and middle-class persons are sufferers and they suffer when there is such calamity. They have no other alternative than to go to public institutions for treatment, help, and protection. This circumstance needs to be kept in mind by these officers, the HC observed.

The bench, led by Justice Nalawade, said, We have expressed that this court may visit the sites to see that there is a discipline in the staff employed. That they are discharging their duties seriously and there are no lapses whatsoever. The visit will be paid as a surprise visit to the hospitals, to the quarantine institutions, and even to the isolation wards and the containment zones.

It went on to warn the errant officials. This court is making it clear that if it is found that the persons who are expected to discharge the duty are not present on the spot and due to that the spread of the virus is going on, this court will be giving directions specifically in respect of those persons to register the crime against those persons immediately and those persons may be of any rank.

In light of these observations, the court said that it would pay surprise visits to hospitals, quarantine, and COVID-19 care centers and containment zones. It said that if it finds that staff negligence is leading to the spread of the virus, criminal action will be taken against the errant public servant or staffer, no matter their rank. This court will not be sparing anyone if such lapses are found, the bench said, posting the hearing for July 7.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email