38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Indias 1st Hindu Court Set up by ABHM is an Attempt to Breach the Rule of Law.

By LawStreet News Network      16 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Indias 1st Hindu Court Set up by ABHM is an Attempt to Breach the Rule of Law.

On Wednesday, August 15th, 2018 on the Independence Day, members of the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha (ABHM) have announced to set up the countrys first Hindu Court on the lines of Sharia Courts.

The aim was to make decisions exclusively on Hindu affairs which will resolve issues/disputes. The court has also got its first judge in a ceremony which was held at the party office.

National Vice President of Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha, Pandit Ashok Sharma said we had challenged the establishment of Shariat Courts a few days ago and asked that they should not exist at all because there should be one constitution for all. We had even asked the government in a letter that we sent demanding this, that if our demands are not met, we will set up a similar court for Hindus. Since no action was taken in our favour, we set up the first Hindu Court here on Wednesday.

National Secretary, Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha, Pooja Shakun Pandey who has been appointed as the first judge of the Hindu Court said that we will deal with matters related to Hindus only and the issues will range from harassment of Hindu women, Hindu marriages, disputes of property or money, and many others. When the BJP came to power in the centre and the state, we had high hopes from them but since they have started playing divide and rule among Hindus on the basis of caste, Hindu court is a way to bring them together. We will have proper jails and our maximum punishment will be death.

As per the announcement, the court shall consist of five judges who will be appointed in different parts of the country on November 15th, 2018 and the bylaws of the court which is planned by the party members will be declared by October 2nd, 2018.

The attempt to establish a Hindu Court in the country by the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha allegedly breaches the Rule of Law and undermines the judicial system of the country as the political party has no authority to establish a court.

The Courts in India are established under the mandate of the Constitution of India which is a rulebook to govern the entire land and is applicable to everyone irrespective of their religion.

The Constitution of India provides the establishment and constitution of the Union Judiciary, State Judiciary and Subordinate Courts in India. No political party such as Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha has the power to establish a court which is only bestowed on the Constitution of India.

Moreover, India is a secular country, the same is mentioned in the Preamble of the Constitution. Secularism means that there is no State religion and all religions are equal before law. Establishment of a Hindu Court is a clear violation of the basic principle of the Constitution.

The act of establishing a Hindu Court also raises questions as to, on what authority the court will summon the opposite parties and witnesses and how will its orders be implemented without a police force if somebody is to breach its orders. Without a proper framework and sanction behind the orders, the purpose of the court is completely dissolved.

Hence, establishing a private parallel judicial system by formulating a separate Hindu Court is not permitted by law. Necessary action should be taken against the members of the political parties who tried to take law into their own hands by assuming the position above the Constitution of India.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email