38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, December 02, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Legal Insiders

Justices Dinesh Maheshwari And Sanjiv Khanna Elevated To Supreme Court

By Lawstreet News Network      Jan 17, 2019      0 Comments      1,083 Views
Justices Dinesh Maheshwari And Sanjiv Khanna Elevated To Supreme Court

The government on January 16, 2019, notified the appointment of Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Delhi High Court judge, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, as Supreme Court judges.

The appointment was notified amidst rising questions over Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation of Justice Khanna on January 10, 2019.

The Collegium led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi unanimously recommended Justice Khanna’s name along with Justice Maheshwari's after dropping its earlier recommendation on December 12, 2018, to elevate Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court Pradeep Nandrajog and Delhi High Court Chief Justice Rajendra Menon to the Supreme Court.

The decision was taken despite objections raised by sitting apex court judge, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

Justice Kaul had complained about how Justice Khanna’s elevation would be at the cost of overlooking the seniority of other High Court chief justices and judges. Justice Khanna was ranked 33 in the High Court judges’ seniority list.

In its resolution dated January 10, 2019, the Collegium said “certain decisions” were indeed taken on December 12, 2018. However, it said, there was no time for the “required consultation” on the decisions taken earlier due to the intervening Winter vacations for the court and retirement of Justice Madan Lokur, which changed its composition.

The Collegium said “fresh” and “extensive” deliberations were held after the vacations by the newly constituted Collegium, in which Justice Arun Mishra replaced Justice Lokur. The Collegium said it had “deemed it appropriate to have a fresh look at the matter and also to consider the proposals in the light of the additional material that became available”.

The Collegium records that it found Justices Maheshwari and Khanna “more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne judges of the High Courts”.

Former CJI R.M. Lodha also questioned the Collegium’s decision and said that “When a decision is once taken, it has to be taken to its logical conclusion.”

Justice Lodha said the Collegium has to be transparent about “why it dropped Justice Nandrajog and why Justice Maheswari, who was superseded a while ago by Justice Ajay Rastogi, is now once again the front-runner for the Supreme Court? Why was Justice Nandrajog picked first and then dropped?”

Former CJI K.G. Balakrishnan also expressed concern over the Collegium’s decision and said that it is quite irregular that the Collegium has sidelined the seniority and merit of three judges from the Delhi High Court — Justices Gita Mittal, Nandrajog and Ravindra Bhat — to recommend Justice Khanna.

“The Collegium does not usually overlook the seniority of three judges from the same high court to choose a fourth judge,” Justice Balakrishnan said.

“Collegium decisions are not just child’s play. Five judges of the Supreme Court have taken a decision on the appointment of a judge. What are the reasons for dropping that decision taken on December 12,” the retired CJI asked.

The former CJI said seniority is the prime consideration of the Collegium while recommending judges for the Supreme Court. (Source The Hindu)

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi
Share this article:

Lawstreet News Network

Leave a feedback about this

Related Posts
View All



Legal Insiders
Law college professor ends life by suicide
24 days ago


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email