38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Lawyers Address Letter to CJI Detailing Ongoing Migrant Worker Crisis; Demand Action From The Apex Court On The Matter

By Tanurag Ghosh      29 May, 2020 06:19 PM      0 Comments
Lawyers Address Letter to CJI Detailing Ongoing Migrant Worker Crisis; Demand Action From The Apex Court On The Matter

In a developing country like India, more than half of the population goes through harsh ordeals to carry out basic tenets of life. The migrant workers, a significant amount of population, are one of the most deprived sections of Indian society. With no property, comfort, or work around their homes, this section of the society consists of people who travel hundreds of miles away from their homes to earn bread for their family. With the onset of a sudden lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these people were practically left hanging by their employers, the society, and even the government. 

In such a problematic scenario, the judiciary was bound to take some action regarding the prevailing crisis. Around 20 prominent lawyers of the Indian legal industry wrote a letter addressed to Chief Justice of India, S.A. Bobde calling out the apex court to take cognizance in the matter. The letter signed by prominent legal practitioners like Prashant Bhushan, Indira Jaising, Kapil Sibbal, Iqbal Chagla, and Anand Grover said:

"We respectfully submit that this institutional deference to statements made on behalf of the Government and the Court's apparent indifference to this enormous humanitarian crisis, would if not rectified immediately, amount to the Court having abdicated its constitutional role and duty to these teeming millions of poor, hungry migrants."

Lawyers like Mohan Katarki, Siddarth Luthra, Santosh Paul, Mahalaxmi Pavani, CU Singh, Vikas Singh, AspiChinoy, Mihir Desai, JanakDwarkadas, Rajani Iyer, Yusuf Muchhala, Rajiv Patil, NavrozSeervai, Gayatri Singh and Sanjay Singhvi also signed the letter.

The letter was highly critical of the governments handling of the crisis and said that the basic constitutional promises were being denied to these migrants under these circumstances. Therefore, it urged the court to take up its role and justify its position as the protector of the fundamental rights of people. 

Moreover, the letter also stated that the supreme court assumes a greater role in the time of a crisis like this. It also pointed out relevant facts to the situation like how 75 percent of the migrant workers work in the unorganized sector, and an unexpected lockdown deprived them of their jobs almost instantaneously. 

 

The letter also stated that the court took note of the central governments circular restricting movement of migrant laborers and also accepted that no laborers were on the road for traveling to their homes. 

Due to all these issues, the supreme court took suo-motu cognizance in the matter. A 3-judge bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan directed the Central and the state governments to take measures to provide relief to the workers as there have been 'inadequacies and certain lapses'. The court specified that no travel fee would be charged for these stranded workers, meals would be provided at railway stations and inside trains while traveling, and that no state can prohibit the workers from going home. 

As the lockdown is being lifted in waves with provisions of relief to the general public, the migrant workers stay stranded with the sole objective of going home and spending time with family in these tough circumstances. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

dhcba-announces-abstention-from-work-on-1st-and-3rd-saturdays-opposes-delhi-high-courts-mandatory-sitting-days
Trending Judiciary
DHCBA Announces Abstention from Work on 1st and 3rd Saturdays, Opposes Delhi High Court’s Mandatory Sitting Days [Read Notice]

DHCBA announces abstention from work on 1st and 3rd Saturdays, citing difficulties with Delhi High Court’s mandatory Saturday sittings.

02 April, 2026 01:02 PM

TOP STORIES

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM
court-grants-interim-anticipatory-bail-to-accused-in-5-crore-cyber-fraud-case-directs-joining-of-investigation-on-notice-through-whatsapp
Trending Judiciary
Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail to Accused in ₹5 Crore Cyber Fraud Case; Directs Joining of Investigation on Notice Through WhatsApp [Read Order]

Tis Hazari Court grants interim anticipatory bail in ₹5 crore cyber fraud case; allows WhatsApp notice and bars coercive action against accused.

27 March, 2026 05:22 PM
gujarat-hc-sets-aside-order-forcing-minor-and-mother-to-attend-court-weekly-for-grandfathers-visitation
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Sets Aside Order Forcing Minor and Mother to Attend Court Weekly for Grandfather’s Visitation [Read Judgment]

Gujarat HC sets aside Family Court order mandating weekly court visits for a minor child, stressing child welfare and calling the approach unjust.

27 March, 2026 06:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email