38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

PIL on Vaccination for Legal Fraternity, Bombay HC CJ Cites 'Titanic'; says 'Ship's Captain Leaves Last'

By Aditi Aggarwal      12 March, 2021 11:15 AM      0 Comments
PIL on Vaccination for Legal Fraternity, Bombay HC CJ Cites 'Titanic'; says 'Ship's Captain Leaves Last'

The Bombay High Court Chief Justice Dipankar Datta invoked the iconic American epic Titanic for expressing his views on a PIL seeking to declare members of the legal fraternity, including Judges, as frontline workers and to vaccinate them for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) coronavirus on a priority basis. He said, When the ship runs into rough weather, the Captain leaves last.
 

Judiciary is declared as one of the essential pillars of democracy. The members who are part of this pillar include the Judges, court staff, advocates and their clerks. Hence they are equally important along with the other staff, the petition filed by two advocates from Raigad district in Maharashtra, Vaishnavi Gholave and Yogesh Morbale reads.

The hearing began with the court asking the petitioner why such a PIL was not filed for the staff of private organizations and dabbawallas. That way everyone is a frontline worker, CJ Datta said. He further said that the executive has done a fantastic job and some things should be left to its wisdom.

Justice Dipankar Datta rhetorically asked,

Have you seen the English movie Titanic? Do you recollect the captain of the ship? Captain Smith. When the ship runs into rough weather, what does the captain have to do?

After which, he added:

He should be the last one to leave. I am the captain of the ship here. First comes society, then my judiciary and last me.

Advocate Yashodeep Deshmukh was quick to respond that politicians were also Captains of their ships but they were getting vaccinated. He then requested the court to issue a notice or at least direct the State to consider the representation made to declare members of the legal fraternity as frontline workers.

He clarified that he had no grievance against those who are getting it.

Not every doctor was facing the risk of the virus. Some kept their clinics closed for months. But the State included them because it is a necessity, he said.

He also said that there were lawyers from legal aid services, who worked tirelessly for the release of undertrials and to decongest prisons.

The magistrates, public prosecutors who interact with police officers and undertrials, aren't they entitled to vaccination? the advocate asked.

Answering which Justice Datta said that:

There is a risk, no doubt. We have to be cautious and careful. But you are asking for a writ of mandamus for the judiciary from the judiciary. 

Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh then informed the court that Bharat Biotech has already filed an application seeking transfer of all these matters to the Supreme Court. The Court said they were not inclined to intervene unless there was something amiss in the policy, but the petitioner had mentioned "access to justice.

However, the division bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and GS Kulkarni sought to know what was the eligibility criteria for getting a Covid vaccine as it is very easy to get a doctor's prescription these days. So that the noble object is not exploited by scheming people. The ASG said he would come back with instructions. 

 

The matter has been adjourned to March 17.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

mamata-banerjee-refuses-to-resign-after-historic-election-defeat
Trending Political NEWS
Mamata Banerjee Refuses to Resign After Historic Election Defeat

Mamata Banerjee defies convention, refuses to resign despite massive poll defeat—triggering a constitutional debate over mandate, legality, and democratic norms.

05 May, 2026 10:29 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-spicejets-review-petition-against-144-crore-deposit-order-imposes-50000-costs
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects SpiceJet’s Review Petition Against ₹144 Crore Deposit Order, Imposes ₹50,000 Costs

Delhi High Court rejects SpiceJet’s review against ₹144 crore deposit order in Maran dispute, imposes ₹50,000 costs for non-compliance with directions.

05 May, 2026 12:36 PM
silence-of-differently-abled-rape-victim-cannot-suppress-truth-courts-must-focus-on-substance-over-manner-of-expression-sikkim-hc
Trending Judiciary
Silence of Differently-Abled Rape Victim Cannot Suppress Truth; Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Manner of Expression: Sikkim HC [Read Judgment]

Sikkim High Court upholds rape conviction, ruling that a differently-abled victim’s silence cannot override credible medical and eyewitness evidence.

05 May, 2026 12:45 PM
sc-stays-5-lakh-cost-condition-for-setting-aside-non-bailable-warrants-against-accused-in-sfio-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays ₹5 Lakh Cost Condition for Setting Aside Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in SFIO Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court stays ₹5 lakh cost condition for setting aside non-bailable warrants in SFIO case, says validity of such condition needs examination.

05 May, 2026 12:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email